The White House is once again toying with the idea of HARP 3.0 - using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to refinance underwater non-agency loans, giving the GSEs leeway to charge higher guaranty fees for securitizing these mortgages, and waiving mortgage insurance requirements, according to industry officials who’ve been briefed on the plan. However, such an effort – modeled on the GSE’s Home Affordable Refinancing Program – would require Congressional approval and is already meeting with industry resistance. Also, many House Republicans are not happy with the thought. “While we all recognize the need to help as many underwater borrowers as possible, I do not think any further expansion of the GSE charter to originate higher risk, underwater loans makes sense and only shifts risk from the private sector onto the U.S. taxpayer,” said David Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “Based on past experience, the GSEs are not experts at pricing these kinds of risks.”

The official watchdog of the Federal Housing Finance Agency has pointedly suggested that the GSE regulator direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine whether or by how much the two companies were swindled out of billions of dollars as a result of banks’ alleged manipulation of a key interest rate and then determine how to recoup those losses, in court if necessary. A recent unpublished memo by the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General urged the Finance Agency to prepare to file suit against the banks involved in setting the London Interbank Offered Rate after an analysis of the GSEs’ published financial statements and publicly available historical interest data concluded that Fannie and Freddie may have suffered more than $3 billion in losses due to LIBOR manipulation.

Citing a lack of any “specific credible evidence of actual violations” within its purview, the House Ethics Committee last week announced it has dropped its probe of alleged legislative influence pedaling related to Countrywide Financial’s “VIP Program.” In a statement dropped on Dec. 27, the committee said that although there was some evidence of mortgage loans made to House members and staffers through Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo's “Friends of Angelo” program, the allegations are either too dated or involve individuals no longer serving in the House.

Mortgage market observers say they are seeing a gradually building struggle by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to maintain its precarious balance between the FHFA’s congressionally-mandated roles as conservator to the GSEs and – indirectly – regulator of 65 percent of the mortgage market. Industry interests, meanwhile, continue to call for greater “transparency” surrounding Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related decision making. Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the FHFA was created to succeed the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight as regulator to Fannie and Freddie as well as the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks.

Fannie Mae is working on building an in-house unit to value mortgage servicing rights, according to industry officials who’ve been briefed on the GSE’s plans. However, it’s unclear at this point how far along Fannie is. A spokesman for the company declined to comment to Inside The GSEs about the matter. Officials familiar with the effort, including one former GSE executive, said Fannie is looking to value MSRs for two main reasons: to better judge counter-party risk on mortgage bankers that sell residential loans to the company, and perhaps to better value the asset because it may have plans to buy or finance servicing rights in the future.

The FHA has made changes to its internal systems to make sure lenders are paying the correct recertification fees based on the number of FHA-approved branch offices. Currently, an approved lender is required to pay annual recertification fees within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year to maintain approval for the next annual reporting period. Recertification fees cover the home office and each FHA-approved branch office. Previously, lenders were allowed to terminate branch offices at the start of the annual reporting period but before paying the recertification fees. However, system flaws caused ...

An FHA lender need not cancel a scheduled foreclosure sale to reassess a borrower if the property is non-owner occupied, vacant or an investment property, according to newly issued agency guidance. Under such circumstances, the lender does not have to cancel a foreclosure sale date because loss mitigation retention options are only available to owner-occupants, the FHA explained in a frequently-asked-questions guidance on the revised requirements for loss mitigation retention options. The FHA announced the changes last month in an effort to ...

Ginnie Mae servicers reported a small increase in total production on a quarterly basis and a modest improvement year-over-year, according to an Inside FHA Lending analysis of FHA data. Third quarter servicing volume was up 2.1 percent to $1.3 trillion from the previous quarter and 9.7 percent from the same period last year. Not surprisingly, top-ranked Wells Fargo Mortgage and second-place Bank of America accounted for 52.0 percent of total production. Wells Fargo grew its Ginnie Mae servicing portfolio to $399.6 billion in the third quarter, 4.2 percent better than the previous quarter and a 17.4 percent improvement from a year ago. That bumped up Wells’ market share to ... [1 chart]

Wells Fargo Bank and Bank of America maintained their dominance in the FHA servicing market while the other institutions in the top five category held on to their respective market shares in the third quarter of 2012, according to the latest rankings by Inside FHA Lending. Except for some slight changes in the rankings, overall volume appeared flat during the quarter with no significant jumps or decline. The volume of mortgage debt outstanding with FHA insurance increased to $7.6 billion in the third quarter, up from $7.5 billion the previous quarter, with top-ranked Wells Fargo and second-place BofA accounting for ... [1 chart]

Despite the renewed focus on the FHA in the wake of the recent actuarial report, analysts do not expect any meaningful action in 2013 given the important role that FHA plays in supporting the housing market. But that does not mean that the Department of Housing and Urban Development will be sitting idly by next year. It has a lot of additional measures to implement to protect and preserve the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan told Senate lawmakers recently during a hearing on the condition of the fund. The changes are both ...