Federal financial regulators are still sifting through stacks of criticism about their controversial risk-retention proposal for the MBS and ABS market and have not yet decided whether to start over again with a new proposed rule, as most industry groups have urged them to do. The agencies are also getting a lot of push from Capitol Hill to re-think the original proposal, which was released in late March. “I am very concerned that if the qualified residential mortgage definition being worked out by regulators isn’t broad enough, it could hurt the housing market, especially...

Lawmakers and experts reviewing a proposed bill that seeks to drastically overhaul the secondary mortgage market without the need for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac question whether the Federal Housing Finance Agency is the most appropriate choice to implement key components of the program.The Private Mortgage Market Investment Act, drafted but not yet filed by Rep. Scott Garrett, R-NJ, would create a heavily regulated mortgage-backed securities market made up solely of private entities that would function with no federal guarantee at all.

Debt issuance for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks all recorded increases in new debt issuance during the third quarter of 2011.The three GSEs collectively issued $797.7 billion in new debt issue during the third quarter, a 9.8 percent increase from the previous quarter, while GSE debt outstanding at $2.152 trillion declined 4.8 percent from the second quarter.

Just in time for the holidays, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each announced last week that all foreclosure-related evictions from occupied single-family and two-to-four unit properties with Fannie or Freddie mortgages will be suspended from Dec. 19, 2011 to Jan. 2, 2012.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be put into “irrevocable receivership” with the Federal Housing Finance Agency tasked as their receiver no later than 18 months after enactment of a bill introduced in the Senate this week.Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-GA, introduced the Mortgage Finance Act of 2011 to “get the American taxpayer out of the business of bailing out the mortgage industry.” The bill would wind down Fannie and Freddie while creating a new regulatory framework for “high-quality” mortgage securitization for both single-family and multifamily mortgages.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency needs to be much more hands-on and engaged in its oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to the Finance Agency’s official watchdog.The FHFA Office of Inspector General’s conclusion is not new, but the OIG doubled down on its criticism of the agency last week both in its Semiannual Report to Congress and in written testimony submitted to the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

The CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac told lawmakers last week they have been working to manage all expenses prudently at the taxpayer-subsidized government-sponsored enterprises even as they sought to explain away reports that the two GSEs ran up a six-figure bill attending an industry convention in Chicago in October.Testifying before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Fannie CEO Michael Williams and Freddie CEO Charles Haldeman noted the GSEs’ importance in the current and future mortgage markets even as they cited their efforts to reduce overall expenses through money-saving cuts and improvements in operational efficiency over the last three years.

A proposed radical shift in how lenders are paid for servicing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages would make the business less feasible and skew the competitive landscape even more than it is, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. In a comment letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the MBA said the regulator and the two government-sponsored enterprises ought to shelve their controversial plan to reform servicing compensation. The FHFA and the GSEs have focused on two alternatives: a fee-for-service model favored by the agencies, and an industry proposal to reduce the...

The number of settlement problems as an overall percentage of market closings has increased in past months as on-time settlements plunged to 47 percent from 65 percent, according to the latest survey by the National Association of Realtors. Respondents to a monthly NAR survey cited problems with obtaining mortgages along with appraisal and inspection problems as causes of settlement delays and cancellations. The inability to obtain a mortgage was reported by 9 percent of respondents in October as causing a settlement cancellation, up from 4 percent in September. Asked whether they had any problems in...

Some large banks may be re-thinking their commitment to the mortgage business and creating opportunities for a number of mid-sized firms, according to analysts at FBR Capital Markets. Servicing problems and mounting repurchase demands have pushed some large banks to allocate less capital to mortgage banking and slowed their originations, FBR analysts said. “This has created an opportunity for smaller players to step up and fill the void while still attaining healthy margins,” the company added. FBR specifically pointed to PHH Mortgage, U.S. Bank, Quicken Home Loans, Provident Funding, BB&T and...