It increasingly appears that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will come out with a qualified mortgage/ability-to-repay rule that will include a legal “safe harbor” for most mortgages – and a “rebuttable presumption” for the rest. Industry attorneys, lobbyists and consumer advocates indicate the CFPB is leaning towards granting a safe harbor for what will be defined as “prime” mortgages – presumably most of the loans that are backed by the federal government. “What we’re hearing is there could be...

The Mortgage Insurance Companies of America urged U.S. banking regulators not to exclude private mortgage insurance as they consider the proposed Basel III risk-based capital framework for the nation’s banks. Commenting on the proposed rules this week, MICA urged regulators to acknowledge the crucial role private mortgage insurance plays in the single-family residential market and recognize it in the proposed capital rules “with a reduced capital charge.” “Exclusion of private mortgage insurance in the proposed rules is a departure from accepted banking practices and would have ‘unintended adverse consequences on housing finance and the broader U.S. economy,’” said Suzanne Hutchinson, MICA executive vice president. Under the proposed U.S. implementation of Basel III, conventional residential mortgages with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80 percent, regardless of the presence of private mortgage insurance, could trigger...

Congress will act on a bipartisan basis after the November elections to approve legislative changes to the Home Affordable Refinance Program, a well-connected industry participant predicted, although some Republicans in Congress remain opposed to a bill crafted by Senate Democrats Robert Menendez, NJ, and Barbara Boxer, CA. Lewis Ranieri, chairman and founding partner of Ranieri Partners, said this week that he fully expects Congress to approve S. 3522, the “Responsible Homeowner Refinancing Act,” after the upcoming elections. He suggested that Republicans have been unwilling to pass the bill due to fears that approving an Obama administration proposal could hurt their re-election efforts. Ranieri made...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s internal watchdog said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could mitigate more losses if they recover mortgage deficiencies from borrowers more efficiently. An FHFA Office of Inspector General report found weaknesses in the ability of the government-sponsored enterprises to collect shortfalls from borrowers from post-foreclosure sales. In 2011, the GSEs recovered only a small fraction of the deficiencies they pursued, an estimated $4.7 million collected out of $2.1 billion pursued, the IG reported. The IG blames this on the FHFA’s lack of guidance and oversight of the GSEs’ deficiency recovery efforts. While the FHFA has an opportunity to provide...

The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York opened a new battlefront in intense warfare over losses taken by investors and others in the collapse of the housing market. The government this week filed charges against Bank of America, as the party left liable for activities at Countrywide Home Loans, based on the False Claims Act, a federal law that provides for hefty treble damages and penalties. The FCA has been used in recent mortgage-related charges involving FHA loans, but the new filing attempts to expand the law to loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In its filing, the government contends...

Recent efforts by the government-sponsored enterprises and the Federal Housing Finance Agency to offer clarity and consistency about repurchase demands may or may not bear fruit as neither agency officials nor industry observers can speak confidently as to its ultimate effectiveness. According to participants at an Inside Mortgage Finance webinar this week, the GSE representation and warranty framework unveiled by the FHFA last month and the GSEs’ new quality control guidelines announced last week are steps in the right direction but there are a lot of moving parts to take into account. “We tried the best we could to address...

Advocates for GSE reform say recent actions by the Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency have made it more important than ever for policymakers to start moving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac away from government support or risk seeing the two enterprises enveloped forever within the federal budget. Two former Bush administration Treasury officials made their case this week in a Washington Post opinion piece, citing the government’s recent sale of stock in insurance giant American International Group to recoup the bailout billions Uncle Sam floated the company during the financial crisis as an admittedly inexact blueprint for Congress and the White House to follow to get the feds out of Fannie and Freddie.

More than a year after the Federal Housing Finance Agency first announced its proposal to sell investors Fannie Mae foreclosed properties in bulk for rentals and two months into its second sale with less than 800 properties moved, market watchers are expressing skepticism about whether the program will ever advance beyond the pilot stage. Earlier this month, the FHFA announced that New York-based Cogsville Group LLC was the winning bidder of 94 Fannie-owned properties. The firm paid $2.1 million for a share in a joint venture with the GSE resulting in a transactional value to Fannie of $11.8 million or 86.2 percent of the properties’ estimated value.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has proposed a rule to acquire explicit discretionary authority to require Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or any of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks to undergo a stress test every year, no matter how much the GSEs have in consolidated assets. The proposed rule, published in the Oct. 5 Federal Register, would implement a part of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires certain financial companies with consolidated assets of more than $10 billion, and which are regulated by a primary federal financial regulatory agency, to conduct an annual stress test.

Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s home retention activity declined for the most part during the second quarter of 2012, according to a new analysis of Federal Housing Finance Agency data by Inside The GSEs. Total loss mitigation activity – total home retention efforts and foreclosure alternatives combined – declined 11.4 percent during the second quarter of the year to 190,315. Total loss mitigation for the first six months of the year fell 18.6 percent to 405,127 compared to the same six-month period in 2011.