Although Fannie Mae has been pushing certain thinly capitalized nonbanks to its cash window for loan sales, it also wants to know why others that have the capital – and approvals – aren’t issuing mortgage-backed securities. A Fannie spokesman had this to say on the matter: “If not, why not? Maybe it’s time for us to have a conversation with them.”

Building on both GSEs’ recent risk-sharing transactions to achieve the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s $30 billion 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard target, the head of the FHFA said this week to expect more of the same as well as additional risk-sharing innovations. In a speech at the Bipartisan Policy Center, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in concert with the Finance Agency, are “planning for the scope and depth of risk-sharing transactions to continue and expand.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should think twice, then disregard any plans to further cut the multifamily business of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to the ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and GSEs. In a letter to the FHFA earlier this month, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, noted that since the Finance Agency implemented “an arbitrary” 10 percent cut in GSE multifamily business for 2013, “an additional reduction further depresses the housing market nationwide, reduces the availability of rental housing, and actually harms the financial stability” of Fannie and Freddie by limiting proven revenue-generating opportunities.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency moved this week to formalize an anti-fraud initiative it rolled out some 16 months ago that requires Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks to notify the agency forthwith of fraudulent activity by a GSE-associated individual or company. The interim final rule published in the Oct. 23 Federal Register generally codifies the procedures under the FHFA’s existing Suspended Counterparty Program, established in June 2012, with a request for public comment.

The law firm that pursued a nearly decade-long class-action fraud lawsuit on behalf of investors against Fannie Mae and their former auditor, KPMG LLP, until its settlement in May say they are entitled to a piece of the $153 million payout, plus expenses. In papers recently filed with the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia, the firm of Markovits, Stock & DeMarco of Cincinnati is seeking attorneys’ fees in the amount of $29.1 million or 22 percent of the settlement amount, plus $15.3 million in “out of pocket” expenses incurred in the nine years of pursuing the class action.

The incredibly shrinking refinance market helped continue the shift in the mix of single-family mortgages securitized by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the month of September, according to a new Inside The GSEs analysis. Fannie and Freddie issued $78.6 billion in single-family mortgage-backed securities in September, a 20.0 percent decline from August, but a 7.0 percent rise for the first nine months of 2013. [Includes one data chart.]

Roughly 4,100 people have registered to attend the annual convention of the Mortgage Bankers Association, which launches Sunday night in Power City USA.

Essent Group, a privately capitalized mortgage insurance firm, has announced plans to raise $286 million through the sale of 19.7 million common shares to fund the growth of its MI subsidiary. The initial public offering will be made at a price range of $13.50 to $15.50 per share, according to the company’s filing with Securities and Exchange Commission. Domiciled in Bermuda, Essent has been approved to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ESNT.” Essent Group is offering...

California was the biggest source of private MI loans for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but the state doesn’t dominate the GSE insured market the way it does in other measures.