A precedent-setting court case decided in May has disrupted the MBS and ABS markets, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Structured Finance Industry Group. The trade groups filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States late last week, calling for the court to hear an appeal of the ruling in Madden v. Midland Funding. In May, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that federal preemption under the National Bank Act doesn’t apply to nonbanks that purchase loans from banks. The Madden ruling subjects nonbank purchasers of loans originated by banks to state usury laws. If a bank’s preemption from such laws isn’t transferred when a nonbank acquires a loan originated by a bank, the loan can be...

The legacy of the housing bust continues to play out in the enforcement arena. Last week, the National Credit Union Administration announced a $225 million settlement with Morgan Stanley, bringing to a close litigation stemming from the purchase of allegedly faulty residential MBS by four corporate credit unions that ultimately failed. The settlement addresses claims brought in 2013 by the NCUA on behalf of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union, Western Corporate FCU, Members United Corporate FCU and Southwest Corporate FCU. As a result of the settlement, the NCUA will dismiss pending suits against Morgan Stanley in federal district courts in New York and Kansas. The firm did not admit...

Wells Fargo is close to reaching a $25.75 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit involving delinquent borrowers who were charged fees for property inspections. The settlement would resolve allegations of violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, among other issues. The bank has denied the allegations while noting that it desires to settle the lawsuit to avoid “the burden, expense and uncertainty of continuing litigation.” The lawsuit, Young v. Wells Fargo ...

There was a flurry of activity, including a call for an investigation by the Department of Justice of Mortgage Bankers Association President David Stevens and two others, following a Dec. 7 New York Times piece criticizing the Obama administration and MBA for looking to shut down the GSEs. Stevens, along with Michael Berman, a former MBA chair, and Jim Parrott, senior fellow at the Urban Institute, all former government officials turned private-sector employees, each met with housing policy officials at the White House after leaving their government posts, according to a guest log review by the New York Times.

The CFPB’s new Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (Regulation C) final rule is likely to increase costs for the mortgage industry – and by extension, homebuyers – while raising the stakes for lenders on the compliance front, according to a recent analysis by attorneys with the Morrison & Foerster law firm.“Among the largest costs of the new Regulation C will be necessary updates to data-collection systems, including integration of those systems with application, underwriting, disclosure, origination, and purchased-loan intake platforms, as applicable,” said the attorneys. In addition, HMDA compliance management will take on a whole new significance. “The need for monitoring and controls tied to new HMDA protocols is a few years off, but the preparation curve promises to be steep,” they ...

Sage Bank, a Lowell, MA-based financial institution with less than $200 million in assets, will pay $1.18 million to settle allegations brought by the U.S. Department of Justice that it violated the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by discriminating in the pricing of its mortgage loans to African-American and Hispanic borrowers. The government accused Sage Bank of charging African-American and Hispanic borrowers higher prices for residential mortgages than similarly situated white borrowers for reasons that had nothing to do with their creditworthiness. “Specifically, under Sage Bank’s pricing policy, each of its loan officers was assigned a target price, which was the price a loan officer was required to achieve on each home loan, regardless of a ...

The ability of mortgage servicers to call struggling borrowers and help them resolve their problems is being compromised by an order from the Federal Communications Commission and needs to be overturned, a trio of industry groups argued in a recently submitted legal brief. The FCC’s order, released June 18, 2015, aims to bolster consumer protections against unwanted telephone calls and texts by, in part, restricting the ability of mortgage servicers, debt collectors and others to make autodialed or prerecorded phone calls without prior express consent of the person called. Violators can be subject to fines of $500 per phone call. A challenge to the FCC’s order is being led by ACA International before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

The CFPB recently brought an $8 million enforcement action against Clarity Services, a national credit reporting firm based in Clearwater, FL, and its owner, Tim Ranney, for allegedly obtaining consumer credit reports illegally and for failing to appropriately investigate consumer disputes. Clarity focuses on data reporting for the under-banked, near prime, and subprime consumer segments, and provides information that is not available from traditional reporting agencies. Instead, its reports are derived from a variety of financial service providers, including auto financers, check cashers, prepaid card issuers, short-term installment lenders, peer-to-peer micro lenders, small-dollar credit lenders, and online small-dollar credit lenders. “Credit reporting plays a critical role in consumers’ financial lives,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Clarity and its owner mishandled ...

The CFPB recently filed a $2.59 million federal complaint against EOS CCA, a debt collection firm based in Norwell, MA, accusing the company of reporting and collecting on old cellphone debt that consumers disputed and EOS did not verify. The company also allegedly provided inaccurate information to credit reporting companies about the debt and failed to correct reported information that it had determined was inaccurate. The bureau’s action appears to revolve around the firm’s handling of just one large portfolio. According to the CFPB, in 2012, EOS paid AT&T $35.4 million for a portfolio of more than three million cellphone accounts with a total face value of $2.3 billion. “Many of these debts were old accounts that had been previously ...

Early this month, the CFPB denied a petition made by UniRush, the program manager for RushCard, a prepaid debit card, to modify a civil investigative demand (CID) the firm had received from the bureau near the end of October. The CID seeks documents, written reports and answers to interrogatories in connection with the bureau’s investigation into whether prepaid debit card issuers, processors, card networks, service providers to prepaid debit card issuers, or other unnamed persons “have engaged in or are engaging in unlawful acts and practices in connection with the offering, operating or servicing of prepaid debit cards.” UniRush seemed to shoot itself in the foot, according to the bureau’s decision and order. The CFPB’s account of the chronology suggests ...