Numerous experts, commenters and observers are under the assumption that President-elect Trump will have to let the courts reach a definitive legal decision on the PHH Corp. v. CFPB litigation before deciding whether to remove CFPB Director Richard Cordray without cause. However, that’s not the case, according to Aditya Bamzai, associate professor of law at the University of Virginia School of Law. In a recent online blog post, Bamzai said the (sometimes unstated) premise in various articles and reports is that the CFPB’s pending challenge to the panel decision somehow prevents any attempt to oust Cordray. “Such a premise appears to rest on two mistaken assumptions: that the president cannot exercise his removal authority absent an Article III judgment authorizing ...
A handful of industry groups representing banks and credit unions wrote to Senate leaders recently, making the case for switching the leadership structure of the CFPB from a single director to a multi-member commission, which was how the bureau was initially envisioned by early advocates such as Elizabeth Warren, then an adviser to President Obama. In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, and Minority Leader-elect Chuck Schumer, D-NY, the Consumer Bankers Association, the Credit Union National Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America, and the National Association of Federal Credit Unions urged lawmakers to pass legislation to create a five-person, bipartisan board to govern the bureau. “The CFPB is an independent regulatory agency that provides the sole ...
Mortgage-related issues will be a big component of the CFPB’s fair lending priorities for 2017, the bureau indicated in an online blog post late last year. Among the issues for the mortgage industry are redlining and servicing. “While the bureau has taken important strides in our efforts to protect consumers from credit discrimination and broaden access to credit, we continue to identify new and emerging fair lending risks and we will monitor institutions for compliance,” said Patrice Ficklin, associate director of the CFPB’s Office of Fair Lending. Going forward, then, the bureau is increasing its focus in three key areas, the first of which is redlining. “We will continue to evaluate whether lenders have intentionally avoided lending in minority neighborhoods,” ...
CFPB Again Moves Against Finance Company. Late last month, the CFPB took its second legal action against Military Credit Services, LLC, a Norfolk, VA-based finance company, accusing the company of making loans with improper disclosures.... TransUnion Agrees to $19.4 Million Settlement. TransUnion, one of the largest credit reporting agencies in the U.S., has agreed to settle a dispute with the CFPB over the company’s practices related to the advertising, marketing and sale of consumer reports, credit scores or credit marketing products to consumers, the firm said in a recent Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission....
One of the most speculative stock bets out there – buying shares in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – is looking more like a sure thing these days, thanks to the recent pick of Mick Mulvaney, R-SC, to head the Office of Management and Budget in the new Trump administration. At least that’s how some industry officials and market watchers view it, including the Washington-based research firm Cowen & Co. In a report issued earlier this week, Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg called the choice of Mulvaney for OMB chief “the most bullish sign yet that the Donald Trump administration will favor a solution to housing finance reform that includes a continued role for Fannie and Freddie.”
A New York appellate court this week denied Credit Suisse’s motion to dismiss claims made by NY Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in relation to the creation and sale of MBS to investors. In a majority decision, the New York Supreme Court held that the AG’s claims of securities fraud and persistent fraud or illegality are not time-barred, finding that the claims under the state Martin Act and Executive Law are governed by the six-year statute of limitations rather than the three-year limitations found in Section 214(2) of the state’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR). As of March 21, 2012, the parties entered...
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has fined three reverse-mortgage lenders $790,000 in combined civil penalties to resolve charges of deceptive advertising to consumers. The bureau also ordered American Advisors Group (AAG), Reverse Mortgage Solutions (RMS) and Aegean Financial to stop the misleading ads and to implement compliance plans that include an advertising compliance policy. The misleading ads allegedly violate the federal Mortgage Acts and Practices – Advertising Rule (Regulation N) and the Dodd-Frank Act. AAG is the largest originator of FHA-insured reverse mortgages in 2016, with a 13.9 percent share of the HECM market. RMS third with a 4.11percent share, while Aegean, in 27th place, accounts for 0.48 percent. The three lenders allegedly ran ads that similarly misrepresented that a consumer with a reverse mortgage could not lose the ...
A recent ruling by Florida’s Fifth Court of Appeal, if finalized, will affect any FHA foreclosure case that references the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s mandatory face-to-face interview with borrowers, according to industry attorneys. In Palma v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, et al., the state appellate court found that HUD’s face-to-face interview requirement is “a condition precedent to foreclosure” for Florida mortgages that specifically incorporate the HUD regulation. Prior to the decision, no Florida appellate court has held that HUD’s requirement constitutes a condition precedent to foreclosure, according to attorneys with the Richmond, VA, law firm McGuireWoods. “Although this decision is not yet final and rehearing is likely, it has far-reaching impacts on the conditions and evidence required for foreclosure trials throughout Florida and is the ...
PHH Corp. has until Dec. 22, 2016, to respond to an order by the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals related to its battle with the CFPB over alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The appeals court had directed the lender to reply to the bureau’s petition for an en banc rehearing of the recent ruling by a three-judge panel of the court. Back in October, the panel determined that two aspects of the CFPB’s structure – the dismissal of the director of the agency only for cause and the single directorship as opposed to a multi-member bipartisan commission – were unconstitutional. Additionally, the judges found in favor of the company’s arguments, among others, around the correct interpretations ...
Current and former Democrat members of Congress recently submitted a joint brief to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in support of an en banc rehearing in the PHH Corp. v. CFPB case, including Dodd-Frank drafters and supporters, such as one of the bill’s namesakes, former Rep. Barney Frank, along with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both from Massachusetts. The lawmakers argued that this case presents “a question of exceptional importance” and requires an en banc rehearing because the three-judge panel’s decision restructures the CFPB in a way that conflicts with Congress’s legislative plan. “By severing the for-cause removal provision, the panel decision fundamentally altered the CFPB’s structure in a way that is at odds with Congress’s design and will undermine the ...