The initial progress report released last week on the national mortgage settlement drew attention to the early loss mitigation completed by the five banks participating in the settlement. However, Joseph Smith, the monitor of the $25.0 billion settlement, has also stressed that he is looking for noncompliance with the settlement’s 304 servicing standards. The Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight allows borrowers and professionals assisting homeowners to detail experiences with servicers participating in the settlement. “It’s important for people in the marketplace to let me know if they see conduct that they think violates the settlement agreement,” Smith said. Smith said he has received...

The U.S. Department of Justice showed its willingness to go after relative unknowns as well as the name brands in reaching a multi-million-dollar “pattern or practice” fair lending settlement with GFI Mortgage Bankers Inc., the mortgage banking unit of GFI Capital Resources Group that funds roughly $1 billion in residential mortgage loans annually. The federal government alleged that GFI engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination by charging qualified African-American and Hispanic borrowers more for their...

The blowback over yield-spread premiums and subprime mortgages continued in Lee v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has determined that a lender – in this case, Countrywide Home Loans, and by extension, parent Bank of America – may be liable under state common law claims of civil conspiracy for failing to disclose fees paid to a mortgage broker. This subprime mortgage case was brought by the borrowers (the Lees) against the lender (Countrywide), its parent company (Bank of...

The Department of Housing and Urban Development appears to have lost a round in its fight to bring an alleged FHA defrauder to justice. HUD suffered a setback recently after U.S. District Judge Gray Miller in Houston granted declaratory relief to Allied Home Mortgage Corp. (AHMC) to challenge HUD’s suspension of the lender’s authority to originate and underwrite FHA-insured loans. The Houston-based lender contends that HUD acted capriciously and arbitrarily without due process of law. It based these claims on ...

$7.5 Million FHA Mortgage Fraud Scheme. The Department of Justice has filed charges against top executives of a real estate brokerage for their participation in a mortgage fraud scheme that may cost the FHA $7.5 million in losses. Indictments were unsealed earlier this month in Manhattan federal court charging Mitchell Cohen and Erin Davis, the owner and sales manager, respectively, of Buy-A-Home, a real estate brokerage business in Queens, NY. The criminal charges follow a civil fraud lawsuit filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York last December against ...

A lawsuit filed last week by Bank of New York Mellon against WMC Mortgage and GE Mortgage Holdings is the latest sign that repurchase issues on non-agency mortgage-backed securities are increasing. After years of resistance, trustees are starting to act on behalf of non-agency MBS investors seeking repurchases. Three of the four major banks reported increases in non-agency repurchase requests in the second quarter of 2012 compared with the previous quarter, according to an analysis by Inside Nonconforming Markets ...

The Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an in-depth investigation of non-agency mortgage-backed securities issued by Ally Financial’s Residential Capital, according to court documents released this week. The documents revealed that due diligence provider R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company has delayed the investigation, which started in February. “The commission is investigating ResCap’s origination and underwriting practices used to make and approve loans in connection with offerings of ...

M&T Bank announced this week that it will acquire Hudson City Bancorp for $3.7 billion. The jumbo lender will merge into a subsidiary of M&T. Hudson City was the 10th-ranked non-agency jumbo lender in 2011, according to Inside Nonconforming Markets, with an estimated $3.15 billion in such originations. Officials at M&T said they acquired Hudson – which was having difficulties funding its jumbo originations – to expand M&T’s retail branch network. Officials at Hudson City said M&T will help expand ... [Includes five briefs]

A federal appeals court has agreed to hear a rare appeal by one of the non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuers and underwriters being sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for allegedly misrepresenting the deals that were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals accepted UBS Americas’ appeal to re-argue and reverse a lower court’s denial of the bank’s motion to dismiss the FHFA’s suit as time-barred under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act.The FHFA sued UBS in July 2011 on behalf of Fannie and Freddie, seeking damages and civil penalties on behalf of the government-sponsored enterprises under the Securities Act of 1933.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency violated federal law when it rolled back the Property Assessed Clean Energy program without going through the required notice and comment period, a California federal judge ruled earlier this month. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken’s Aug. 9 ruling held that the FHFA was not acting as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but as a regulator that had improperly exercised substantive regulatory oversight in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act when the agency put a stop to GSE involvement with PACE programs.“The FHFA’s directives on PACE obligations amount to substantive rule-making, not an interpretation of rules that would be exempt from the notice and comment requirement,” wrote Judge Wilken. “The notice and comment process must be followed.”