HSBC North America Holdings agreed to a $470.0 million settlement late last week with the Department of Justice, 49 state attorneys general and other regulators. The settlement is similar to the $25 billion settlement five big banks agreed to in 2012 and suggests that regulators aren’t finished focusing on servicing issues that occurred during the financial crisis. “The agreement is part of our ongoing effort to address root causes of the financial crisis,” said Benjamin Mizer, a principal deputy assistant attorney general and head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. The HSBC settlement includes...

Normally during this time of year, the mergers and acquisitions game is somewhat quiet in the mortgage industry, but concerns over compliance with the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule known as TRID are sparking some lenders to consider selling and getting out. That’s the opinion of Chuck Klein, managing partner of Mortgage Banking Solutions, who said, “I’m as busy as I’ve ever been this time of year.” Speaking on the Internet radio program “Lykken on Lending” recently, the M&A advisor noted that mortgage company owners are “disturbed about the cost and risk of noncompliance.” He added that the TRID rule promulgated by the CFPB “has gotten everyone’s attention,” in particular, owners of nonbanks who have all their personal net worth tied ...

Remember the Dec. 29, 2015, “clarifying letter” that CFPB Director Richard Cordray sent to the Mortgage Bankers Association? Initially, the letter relieved industry anxiety regarding TRID errors, at least to some degree. But over the past few weeks, certain lenders have once again grown nervous and are reporting resistance by secondary market investors that are turning down their mortgages because of TRID errors. For loan buyers, the issue is assignee liability. The MBA is believed to be a key player trying to persuade the bureau to publish the letter in the Federal Register. An industry lobbyist noted that one week after the clarifying letter came to light, MBA “applied immediate pressure to get the letter into Register form. The CFPB ...

Last month’s issuance by the CFPB of a request for information (RFI) regarding its Home Mortgage Disclosure Act resubmission guidelines likely reflects the bureau’s recognition of the additional workload the pending new rule represents, as well as a willingness to hear what the industry has to say about it.In October 2015, the bureau finalized its rule updating the reporting requirements under its HMDA rule, which will significantly expand the amount of information lenders will submit to the agency. “Given these changes, the current resubmission guidelines may need to be updated, and the bureau is seeking feedback on what modifications may be appropriate,” the agency said in early January. But in a recent online blog post, Brooks Bossong, a member ...

A complaint has recently been filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in an attempt to initiate a class-action case against PHH Corp. and Realogy Holdings Corp. and some of their subsidiaries and affiliates for allegedly deceptive and collusive practices in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The case references and appears to be inspired, at least in part, by the enforcement action the CFPB brought against PHH in 2014 in which the bureau alleged the lender violated RESPA by illegally referring borrowers to mortgage insurance companies in exchange for kickbacks. In that case, PHH Corp. v. CFPB, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is set to hear oral arguments on ...

The Mortgage Bankers Association last week wrote the CFPB and other government regulators and agencies to warn that a rule adopted by the Federal Communications Commission last year could harm mortgage servicers when they try to provide early intervention with homeowners who are delinquent on their mortgages. The FCC’s order aims to bolster consumer protections against unwanted telephone calls and texts by, in part, restricting the ability of mortgage servicers, debt collectors and others to make autodialed or prerecorded phone calls without prior express consent of the person called. Violators can be subject to fines of $500 per phone call. But according to the MBA, the rule “threatens to expose mortgage servicers to significant and possibly unavoidable liability when they ...

Last week, Toyota Motor Credit Corp. reached a $21.9 million deal with the CFPB and Department of Justice to settle allegations that the auto lender charged African-American, Asian and Pacific Islander borrowers higher interest rates than white borrowers for their auto loans, without regard to their creditworthiness. In addition to the pay-out to affected minority borrowers, TMCC agreed to change its pricing and compensation system to substantially reduce dealer discretion and accompanying financial incentives to mark up interest rates.As the bureau explained it, TMCC, as an indirect auto lender, sets interest rates, or “buy rates,” for consumers based on credit scores and other risk criteria. Those rates are then conveyed to auto dealers. Auto dealers are then allowed to charge a higher interest rate when they ...

Wells Fargo Settles with FHA for a Record $1.2 Billion. Wells Fargo, the largest player in the Ginnie Mae market, last week agreed to pay the Department of Justice and Department of Housing and Urban Development $1.2 billion to settle FHA underwriting claims. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Wells noted that the agreement “resolves certain civil claims that the federal government had pending” against the lender tied to FHA lending from 2001 to 2010. But it also covers “other potential civil claims relating” to the megabank’s government production in other time periods as well. The megabank, which also is the nation’s largest overall home lender and servicer, saw the settlement coming and booked an additional “legal ...

Legacy RMBS-related legal action continued this week in both Washington, DC, and in New York City as the fallout from the financial crisis continues. In the nation’s capital, Morgan Stanley agreed to a second settlement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., this time for $62.95 million, to resolve RMBS-related claims stemming from the failure of three financial institutions in the wake of the collapse of the mortgage market. The institutions are...

A federal appeals court in Denver unanimously affirmed a lower court ruling that a claim of damage related to an originator/seller’s misrepresentation accrues when the loan is sold. Ruling in six cases involving plaintiffs Lehman Brothers Holdings and Aurora Commercial Corp. versus Universal American Mortgage Co. and Standard Pacific Mortgage, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected plaintiffs’ contentions that their claims were really “indemnification” claims that did not accrue until they bought the loans from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The overarching issue in this complicated case is...