The Supreme Court of the United States considered oral arguments recently in its second high-profile case this session that addresses key issues under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.The case is First American Financial v. Edwards, in which the fundamental question is whether a private purchaser of real estate settlement services has standing under Article III, §2 of the U.S. Constitution to maintain an action in federal court in the absence of any claim that the alleged violation affected the price, quality or other characteristics of the settlement services provided. In this case, respondent Denise Edwards purchased a home in Cleveland in September 2006, obtaining title insurance through Tower City, which issued policies on behalf of First American. Edwards paid $455.43 towards the purchase of the policies (one for her lender and one for herself); the seller of the home paid $273.42.

Federal banking regulators recently put out some fresh signals that they are listening to the lending community and want to collaborate with the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to better harmonize their regulatory, supervisory and examination requirements and procedures to help lower the compliance load for lending institutions. “Our dealings with the CFPB over the last several months have focused on consumer complaints and policy and exam coordination,” John Walsh, acting comptroller of the currency, told members of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee during a recent hearing. “The CFPB currently has in process several rulemakings where interagency consultation will be critical, and we are working on a consultation agreement that will provide the prudential regulators with reasonable time to review, discuss and comment on CFPB rulemakings,” he added.

California. In XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Perry, No. 11-2078, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. cannot intervene in in a litigation dispute between former IndyMac Bancorp executives and their insurers. The court ruled the FDIC did not meet the standard for intervention as a matter of right, or the standard for permissive intervention. Connecticut. In RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. Anna M. Miller et al., the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that RMS Residential Properties, LLC, with an assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., had standing to foreclose after the borrower defaulted, and that MERS was a valid mortgagee at the origination of the loan, as the nominee for the original lender. The court rejected the claim of the defendant, who argued that that MERS, as third party, could not be named as a mortgagee because it was not the original lender or the party secured by the mortgage. The court also rejected the defendant’s request to declare the MERS mortgage to be void because MERS was not the owner of the debt.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. CFPB Now Accepting Mortgage Complaints. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau began accepting mortgage complaints from consumers through its websitefs home page, as of Dec. 1, 2011. To file a complaint, a consumer has to describe what happened and what would be a fair resolution. The consumer is presented with a menu of options and has to specify the type of mortgage involved (conventional fixed-rate, FHA, etc.) as well as the part of the mortgage process involved that is the source of the complaint. Once the complaint is filed, the relevant company will be notified, and the consumer will be provided a tracking number.

Federal regulators have offered few clues on what is next for proposed qualified residential mortgage regulations, and the uncertainty in the marketplace has been cited as an impediment to the resumption of non-agency securitization. “The agencies are carefully evaluating all of the comments received and are now actively engaged in considering the many issues raised as we determine how best to proceed with the risk-retention rulemaking,” Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh said last week. The extended comment period on the proposed rule closed in August ...

The Treasury Department increased its threats against non-agency servicers regarding Home Affordable Modification Program performance. In a report released last week, the Treasury was highly critical of JPMorgan Chase and a number of other non-agency servicers remain on notice. Freddie Mac, acting as the Treasury’s compliance agent for the Making Home Affordable program, conducts quarterly assessments of HAMP servicers. In the third quarter of 2011, Chase was deemed to be in need of “substantial improvement” in compliance with MHA guidelines, the third quarter in a row for the servicer ...

In the world of federal budget magic, Democrats and Republicans are both looking at increases in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guarantee fees as a way to offset the cost of extending payroll tax breaks due to expire at the end of 2011. Both parties so far are rejecting the other party’s proposed solution to keep the tax break, though both bills include nearly identical plans to start raising fees charged by the government-sponsored enterprises. The Senate Democrats’ Middle Class Tax Cut Act of 2011 would start raising GSE guarantee fees by 12.5 basis points per year. The GOP bill in the...

Two significant issues related to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act have received fresh attention at the Supreme Court, which is expected to make landmark rulings next year. The U.S. Solicitor General and a group of state attorneys general filed briefs in Freeman v. Quicken Loans, a case in which the high court will likely determine the ability of the mortgage lending industry to decide what to charge borrowers at the point of origination. RESPA Section 8(b) provides that “no person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of...

Federal financial regulators are still sifting through stacks of criticism about their controversial risk-retention proposal for the MBS and ABS market and have not yet decided whether to start over again with a new proposed rule, as most industry groups have urged them to do. The agencies are also getting a lot of push from Capitol Hill to re-think the original proposal, which was released in late March. “I am very concerned that if the qualified residential mortgage definition being worked out by regulators isn’t broad enough, it could hurt the housing market, especially...

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency provided a status update on the efforts that 12 bank and thrift mortgage servicers are making to comply with the foreclosure practice consent orders they were issued in the spring, a review that documents the extent to which servicing reforms are being implemented.As such, the document may foretell some of the kinds of industry “best practices” that will form the basis of national servicing standards one day.For example, each servicer has established policies and procedures for providing single points of contact to assist borrowers throughout the loan modification and foreclosure processes.