The new documentation was released in conjunction with a non-agency RMBS reform symposium held in New York by SFIG and Information Management Network.

“Banks of all sizes are having problems with the new limits,” the three trade groups argue.

Wells Fargo estimates that a settlement could cost the bank at least $950 million.

As IMFnews went to press, the share price of Altisource was getting slammed, down 20 percent on the day.

Will former Long Beach Mortgage executive Jon Daurio finally launch a new nonprime venture?

On the other hand, examiners cited violations based on policies and procedures reviewed at other servicers.

Lenders are fearful the HMDA proposal does not adequately ensure consumer privacy and that additional costs will be passed onto borrowers.

Are investors in Ocwen jumping for joy now that word is out that NYDFS chief Benjamin Lawsky might be leaving next year?

Stock analysts have claimed that Lawsky has been aggressively investigating Ocwen so he can make headlines, paving the way for an eventual run for public office.

Disparate Impact Theory of Legal Liability Struck Down. Last week, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dealt a heavy blow to the position of the Department of Housing and Urban Development – as well as the CFPB – that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. In American Insurance Association v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the judge struck down HUD’s disparate impact rule, determining that the Fair Housing Act prohibits “disparate treatment only.” In promulgating its disparate impact rule, the court said HUD exceeded its authority under the Administrative Procedures Act. “The ruling is in line with what we have long believed the law to be and consistent with what we argued in ...