“This was really gnarly and political,” said Redwood executive Marty Hughes. “I think the FHFA making this decision was just something that they wanted to get behind them.”
A handful of recent and current U.S., European and international regulatory efforts “pose a serious threat to securitization as a critical source of funding for the real economy,” especially when taken together, a top securitization official told lawmakers in Washington, DC, this week. Testifying before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, Richard Johns, executive director of the Structured Finance Industry Group, took on a handful of the industry’s most problematic regulatory initiatives. Among them were the liquidity ratio rules that U.S. regulators implemented in late 2014, and the new Basel III capital rules that were adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. He also addressed...
It’s no secret that the secondary market for TRID “scratch-and-dent” loans has blossomed the past few weeks – albeit at niche levels – but dealmakers are now trying to figure out how much longer it can last and whether more buyers will step up. To date, Mid America Mortgage Corp., Addison, TX, appears to be the predominant purchaser of the product, which is being offered by at least three firms: Mortgage Delivery Specialists, Rincon Loan Trading and Spurs Capital. Jeffrey Bode, president, CEO and owner of Mid America, told...
Disclosure requirements for publicly-registered ABS have prompted fewer investor-friendly changes than might have been expected, according to analysts at Moody’s Investors Service. The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted the so-called Regulation AB2 disclosure rule in August 2014 and a number of issuers have filed Form SF-3 registration statements in compliance with the rule. “Very few issuers have provided additional collateral and/or performance information beyond the data they were already disclosing prior to SF-3 registration statement requirements,” Moody’s said of auto ABS issuers. The rating service said...
The California Supreme Court late last week issued a ruling in a case where a borrower challenged the foreclosure of a loan that was included in a non-agency MBS issued in 2007. The court allowed the borrower’s claims to proceed, which could prompt a significant increase in foreclosure-related litigation for California mortgages in non-agency MBS. An opinion authored by Kathryn Werdegar, an associate justice of the California Supreme Court, stresses that the court’s ruling in Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage is narrow. “We hold only that a borrower who has suffered a non-judicial foreclosure does not lack standing to sue for wrongful foreclosure based on an allegedly void assignment merely because he or she was in default on the loan and was not a party to the challenged assignment,” Werdegar said. The ruling left...
RSS