The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau plans to develop another rule to resolve some of the mortgage industry’s problems with the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule may provide some psychological relief for lenders. But it’s certainly not solving any of the problems they are struggling with right now, problems that continue to emerge as the months since implementation roll on. Among the host of concerns that have sprung up related to the Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure Rule – TRID – is the raft of issues having to do with settlement agents. Delivering a presentation at the American Bankers Association’s regulatory compliance conference this week, Richard Horn, a former CFPB official, said...
Mortgage lenders soon will be facing higher civil monetary penalties that may be imposed by federal agencies for violations of various lending, servicing and consumer financial protection laws and regulations, warned industry attorneys. As part of the budget bill signed into law last year, the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (FCPIAA) requires federal agencies to adjust the civil penalty amounts they charge for inflation by July 1, 2016. This will be followed be regular adjustments by January 15 of every year. The adjustments must be...
Two appraiser trade groups raised concerns this week that federal banking regulators are re-interpreting longstanding policy to exempt most of the mortgage market from appraisal rules. The American Society of Appraisers and the National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers published a white paper and wrote to leaders in Congress detailing positions taken by federal regulators regarding the application of appraisal standards included in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act. Federal regulators are...
In a letter sent to CFPB Director Richard Cordray, the National Association of Realtors asked the agency to clarify that mortgage originators can share the closing disclosure (CD) form with third parties “if the lender receives a consent form from the consumer.” The trade group noted that, before the TRID rule was implemented, real estate agents aided their clients by answering questions about the HUD-1 and by reviewing terms agreed to in the sales contract, such as concessions, escrows, commissions and shares of prorated taxes.
According to investors in scratch-and-dent TRID mortgages and traders who play in the space, auctions of mortgages with errors (of all sorts) have continued apace ever since the CFPB announcement on TRID 2.0 rulemaking in early May and show little sign of slowing down. At the same time, the TRID mortgage disclosure rule appears to be less of an obstacle for the jumbo mortgage-backed securities market these days as JPMorgan Chase prepares a deal that will include residential loans subject to the rule.
Fannie Mae recently provided sellers with a little more guidance on its expectations related to lender self-reporting of errors in complying with the CFPB’s new disclosure regime under the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
The 11th annual Xerox Path to Paperless Survey finds what appears to be an accelerated pace toward making the paperless mortgage a reality. And the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule known as TRID is apparently helping.
Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, rolled out some of the details of a Republican proposal to replace the Dodd-Frank Act, the Financial CHOICE (Creating Hope and Opportunity for Investors, Consumers and Entrepreneurs) Act. The proposal includes the text of a measure already passed by the House, which would provide a QM safe harbor for any mortgage that has been held in portfolio by a depository institution since origination.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, detailed in a speech a proposal that House Republicans have been working on that would replace the Dodd-Frank Act, including some important changes that would scale back the powers of the CFPB. The bill would shift the agency’s mission to include both consumer protection and maintaining competitive markets, with a cost-benefit analysis of rules performed by an Office of Economic Analysis. Also, it would replace the current single director with a bipartisan, five-member commission which would be subject to congressional oversight and appropriations.