The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is destined for major changes whether they come via the federal courts or Congress, but which one has the bigger impact on the agency’s future is a question that seems to divide industry attorneys. In an analysis, Jerome Walker, a bank regulatory compliance attorney with the Duane Morris law firm in New York, writes it is likely that courts are a greater threat to the CFPB at this point than Congress. Although the House Financial Services Committee has approved legislation that would make major changes at the bureau, the legislation’s future in the Senate is uncertain. “Recent court cases, however, have proven...
The GSE patch expires either in January 2021, seven years after the effective date of the ATR rule, or when the GSEs are taken out of conservatorship, whichever comes first…
Commenting on the latest revelation from Walter, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods said, “Given the lack of visibility, we maintain our underperform rating and $1 price target.”
In the lawsuit, Ocwen admitted that it had stopped paying some of the invoices sent to it by FIS because of what it called “improper and non-compliant billing practices…
“Even with optimal outcomes agreed by all parties in a typical three- to five-year contract, public and private company CEOs find themselves constantly under the ‘results’ microscope," said consultant Paul Hindman.
Perhaps, parts of the CHOICE Act might be siphoned off and made more politically palatable, such as regulatory relief for small community financial institutions.