The U.S. House of Representatives voted recently to overturn the CFPB’s controversial arbitration rule, which is due to kick in Sept. 18. The final rule prohibits “covered providers of certain consumer financial products and services from using an agreement with a consumer that provides for arbitration of any future dispute between the parties to bar the consumer from filing or participating in a class action concerning the covered consumer financial product or service.” It also requires covered providers that are involved in an arbitration proceeding per a pre-dispute arbitration agreement to submit specified arbitral records as well as specified court records to the bureau. House Joint Resolution 111 utilized the authority of the Congressional Review Act to undo the rule ...
If Republicans in Congress are as successful in overturning the CFPB’s arbitration rule as they have been in canning the Affordable Care Act, various sectors of the financial services market could face a great deal of legal risk, according to one top attorney. “The irony here is that CFPB enforcement is frequently a factor in preventing private class-action litigation,” said Joseph Cioffi, chair of the insolvency, creditors’ rights and financial products practice group at the Davis & Gilbert law firm in New York City. “But this rule eliminating arbitration and the void left from President Trump’s moves toward deregulation can act like a supercollider for litigation against lenders, accelerating class actions and ricocheting through the credit markets.” He went on ...
If lawmakers and regulators are interested in bringing capital back to the private mortgage market and facilitating borrower access to credit in a responsible manner, they must make much-needed reforms to a handful of key mortgage rules promulgated by the CFPB, according to bond giant Pacific Investment Management Co. One recommended revision is eliminating the expansion of assignee liability for investors under the CFPB’s ability-to-repay rule. “Currently under the Dodd-Frank Act, mortgage investors are liable for mistakes made by lenders in the mortgage origination process for certain mortgage loans that are not deemed qualified mortgages,” said PIMCO. “Since investors have no role or discretion in the mortgage origination process, we believe this is not only nonsensical, but also has the ...
A handful of top industry trade groups again wrote to CFPB Director Richard Cordray urging him to delay implementation of the bureau’s new Home Mortgage Disclosure Act rules. “Although we greatly appreciate the CFPB’s work to facilitate implementation of this major data collection and reporting rule, the CFPB’s regulatory process and technological framework for this rule are still incomplete,” said the organizations. For one thing, proposed amendments to the rule are not yet finalized. “Moreover, the HMDA data reporting portals, geocoding tools, data validation, and rule edits are not yet issued,” the groups added. “All of these items are needed to ensure compliant business process and systems changes by the effective date.” Additionally, the CFPB has not yet initiated a ...
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-CA, and other Democrat members of the House Financial Services Committee recently released a detailed report in defense of the CFPB and its accomplishments in protecting consumers in the wake of the mortgage market collapse and the financial crisis that led to the Great Recession. “The consumer bureau has worked tirelessly to comply with its statutory mandate to ensure consumers are treated fairly, and that financial institutions are held accountable for predatory and other unscrupulous conduct,” the report said. According to the minority report, the CFPB has produced strong results, such as returning almost $12 billion to 29 million harmed consumers; implementing rules ensuring consumers have access to a fair and competitive marketplace; and requiring clear disclosures ...
The CFPB Office of Inspector General has taken on a new planned project to evaluate the effectiveness of efforts by the bureau’s Office of Consumer Response to share complaint data within the regulatory agency, according to the latest OIG work plan, released last week. “Specifically, this project will examine the extent to which [the Office of] Consumer Response is achieving its objective to share useful complaint data and analysis with internal stakeholders and Consumer Response’s controls over access and distribution of shared complaint data, which can contain sensitive consumer information,” the OIG said.The Office of Consumer Response is responsible for sharing complaint data with internal stakeholders within the CFPB in order to help the bureau supervise companies, enforce federal ...
As previously reported, the only area of mortgage-related consumer complaints that saw an increase in the second quarter was servicing, which saw a jump of 17.5 percent. But a deeper dive into the data shows a more complex and nuanced performance by the industry during that period of time, one perhaps dominated by extremes. As the chart on the following page illustrates, a handful of companies saw triple digit increases from the first quarter to the second, with Bayview Loan Servicing leading the way with a 152.6 percent surge. There was also a second tier of big increases in the upper double digits, led by TD Bank, which registered a leap of 90.9 percent...
Best Odds of Success in Making Consumer Complaint Data Confidential Rest With a New Director at the CFPB. Industry observers and lobbyists are increasingly of the view that the most likely way the industry will see the kind of substantive regulatory reform and relief it needs is not through federal legislation, but rather from a new director at the CFPB... ICYMI: The Financial CHOICE Act Would Exclude AMCs from Points and Fees Calculations. One overlooked provision in H.R. 10, the Financial CHOICE Act, which was passed by the House of Representatives on June 13, deals with residential mortgage appraisals...
Earlier this month, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled against the CFPB and in favor of a Kentucky law firm over allegations it paid kickbacks in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The bureau accused the Borders & Borders law firm of Louisville, KY, and its principals, Harry Borders, John Borders Jr. and J. David Borders, of illegally paying kickbacks for real estate settlement referrals through a network of shell companies. The case began back in February 2011 when the Department of Housing and Urban Development notified the law firm it was being investigated for potential violations of RESPA’s anti-kickback provision. In April 2012, the CFPB advised Borders & Borders that it, rather ...
RSS