The Federal Housing Finance Agency needs to do more to oversee the legal expenses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, though it has limited tools at its disposal to curtail GSE litigation, according to the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General. The OIG’s report, issued this week, noted that the two GSEs have racked up a significant number of billable hours, both before and after being placed in government conservatorship in September 2008, for their defense in lawsuits, investigations and administrative actions.

Some 42 months into the government conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “with no end in sight,” the GSEs’ regulator has planned out the two companies’ next steps but it says Congress needs to have the last word as to the final fate of Fannie and Freddie. Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco this week dispatched his “strategic plan” to House and Senate leaders in which the Finance Agency outlines the next phase of conservatorship for the GSEs while issuing a call to action to lawmakers.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is apparently on the verge of deciding in which jurisdiction the pending $8.5 billion Bank of America/Countrywide residential MBS representations and warranties settlement with Bank of New York Mellon and investors will be finalized. The final outcome is expected to influence similar disputes involving other large mortgage originators, but probably on a smaller scale. Last week, the appeals court held a hearing to determine if the case should be moved back to New York state court, which would accelerate a conclusion of the settlement. “A final decision from...

Citigroup acknowledged some responsibility for a portfolio of badly underwritten FHA loans that led to a $158.3 million settlement with the government, but the company managed to avoid an admission of wrongdoing. As part of the terms and conditions of the settlement, CitiMortgage “admits, acknowledges and accepts responsibility” for the conduct alleged in the government’s complaint. The FHA sought treble damages and civil penalties from CitiMortgage under the False Claims Act for fraud associated with FHA loans it originated. The default rate for FHA loans originated by Citi in 2006 and 2007 was 47...

The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments this week in an important fee-splitting case under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and one issue that took up a lot of air time was whether RESPA is fundamentally a law barring kick-backs or a price-control statute. The key legal provision being examined in Freeman v. Quicken Loans is RESPA Section 8(b), which provides that, “No person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service in connection with a transaction involving a...

In response to a request from the Federal Trade Commission, a U.S. district court has banned a number of defendants from providing mortgage relief services after the agency cracked down on an alleged scam that caused consumers to lose almost $19 million. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants deceptively claimed they were affiliated with or approved by consumers’ lenders, that they could prevent foreclosure, and that they would refund consumers’ money if they failed to deliver promised services. Consumers were allegedly instructed not to contact their lenders and to stop making ...

Supreme Court of the United States.Oral Arguments This Week in RESPA Case. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Tuesday, Feb. 21, in Tammy Foret Freeman, et vir, Petitioners v. Quicken Loans, Inc. The central issue is the legitimacy of fee-splitting under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. At the crux of the legal debate is Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §2607(b), which states that no person “shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of any charge made ...

California. In Kathryn McOmie-Gray v. Bank of America Home Loans FKA Countrywide Home Loans Inc., the Ninth Circuit has ruled that the Truth in Lending Act sets a three-year limitation for the borrower to file notice of claim for loan rescission. McOmie-Gray sought rescission of her loan for alleged violations of disclosure requirements under TILA. The district court dismissed the suit as untimely because it was filed after the three-year period set by TILA. McOmie-Gray subsequently argued to the appeals court ...

The Multi-State Mortgage Committee and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators have issued Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE) Act Examination Guidelines for use by state nondepository mortgage regulators. The primary purpose of the guidelines is “to ensure that all individuals acting as mortgage loan originators are properly licensed and registered under the SAFE Act in all states in which they are conducting business,” said John Ducrest, commissioner of the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions and chairman of the ...

All mortgage lending related institutions under the regulatory purview of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are one step closer to a little more certainty about the confidentiality of the data and information they provide the agency and its officials after action by the House Financial Services Committee last week. The full committee passed H.R. 4014 (introduced by Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-MI), a measure that would stipulate that providing information to the CFPB for any purpose as part of the supervisory process would not be construed as waiving, destroying or otherwise affecting any ...