A white paper issued last week by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association recommends that a Securities and Exchange Commission mandated, but still nascent, automated securities monitoring system should and will eventually incorporate ABS and MBS products into its field of supervision. Last summer, the SEC approved a final rule requiring national securities exchanges, known as SROs, to establish a consolidated audit trail. The SEC rule requires securities exchanges and securities associations to submit to the SEC a plan to create a CAT system that will capture information regarding securities quotes and orders. In particular, the CAT system will have to track...

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors is calling upon the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to adopt a petition process to define “rural” counties as the bureau prepares to implement balloon “qualified mortgage” and escrow requirements for rural lenders.

Twenty state regulators adopted uniform tests for mortgage loan originators on Monday, easing compliance for MLOs doing business in multiple states. State testing has been required since 2009 due to the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act.

The three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit overturned a lower court’s ruling from last summer which determined the FHFA was not acting as conservator but as regulator when the agency halted GSE involvement with PACE programs.

The MBA tells regulators that financial companies shoudn't be held resonsible for social media communications of individual staffers.

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a petition to review a federal appeals court decision to reinstate a securities class action lawsuit filed by MBS investors against Goldman Sachs. In denying the petition, the SCOTUS let stand a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to overturn a lower court’s decision to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit for lack of standing and for failure to show injury.

Fannie Mae may be having second thoughts about selling nonperforming loans into the secondary market where cash-rich investors are waiting with bated breath.

The mystery surrounding how much Fannie Mae really earned in the fourth quarter – and full year – could be solved by the end of next week, as the Federal Housing Finance Agency softens its stance toward allowing the GSE to capture at least a portion of its $64 billion valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Industry officials who claim to have knowledge of the matter said FHFA is actively working with the GSE to resolve the situation. One former Fannie Mae official said it’s likely the agency will allow both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to claim deferred tax assets over several quarters.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, at the direction of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, rolled out a new streamlined loan modification program designed to increase the number of mods and reduce the number of foreclosed loans owned or guaranteed by the GSEs – a move not without some risks, analysts say. Beginning July 1 and running through Aug. 1, 2015, servicers can send modification notices to eligible borrowers who are between 90 days and 24 months delinquent under the Streamlined Modification Initiative. Building on the principles of the FHFA’s Servicing Alignment Initiative, the new streamlined mod effort seeks to encourage servicers to resolve delinquencies earlier and in a more consistent and timely manner to keep more people in their home and minimize losses to the GSEs and taxpayers, according to FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco.

The majority of financial institutions defending themselves against a massive litigation initiative by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for toxic mortgage-backed securities purchased by the GSEs launched a counteroffensive this week by urging a federal appeals court to intervene in their favor against the “unfair” trial judge. Fifteen banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS Americas, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, filed a joint petition with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York complaining that U.S. District Judge Denise Cote has engaged in a “one-sided” approach designed to force a settlement rather than “foster fair and reasonable determination of the issues.”