It appears that well known economist Mark Zandi is indeed a candidate to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency. But will the White House actually nominate him?

Now that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are earning a ton of money, who will have a say over what happens to that cash?

Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase continue to post strong residential finance profits, but there is a growing worry that the "mortgage party" may be drawing to a close.

The unrelenting campaign by liberal Democrats and progressive activists to depose the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s acting director could backfire by making him politically untouchable, while the badgering directed at the Obama administration threatens to alienate the very man they seek to convince to act in their favor, according to industry observers. According to a memo released late this week that was prepared by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s legal team, President Obama has the power to replace FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco without congressional approval. “We conclude that the president has the authority to remove the acting director at will, and there is a strong argument that he has the authority to designate a new acting director, although the answer to that question is less certain,” noted Schneiderman’s memo.

Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s recent, unambiguous return to profitability will diminish an already waning urgency among Capitol Hill lawmakers to proceed with legislative GSE reform as the companies’ profits flow into the U.S. Treasury by the billions, industry experts warn. Fannie announced last week that the GSE expects to remain profitable “for the foreseeable future” after posting record-shattering quarterly and yearly earnings for the period ending Dec. 31, 2012. In the wake of Fannie’s announcement, the White House this week said that from January 2013 to the end of 2023 the two GSEs could send $183.3 billion to the Treasury.

UBS Americas failed in its bid to shut down a lawsuit brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in connection with non-agency mortgage-backed securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while in another case three former Freddie executives lost their own bid to dismiss a Securities and Exchange Commission securities fraud case against them. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week upheld a lower court’s ruling that denied UBS’ motion to dismiss the FHFA’s suit as time barred. In the summer of 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits in Manhattan federal court against UBS and other big banks on behalf of the GSEs, alleging violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 for approximately $200 billion in non-agency MBS sold to Fannie and Freddie.

In recent months, the Securities and Exchange Commission has looked into Regulation AB compliance issues regarding non-agency MBS issuance from 2010 and 2011 by Redwood Trust. The SEC questioned Redwood and others involved in the issuance regarding disclosures of servicing practices. An official at Redwood said the issue largely relates to the complicated nature of Redwood’s deals. In particular, issuance from Redwood often involves multiple servicers, each of which can be subject to Reg AB disclosure requirements. According to correspondence published this week by Redwood, the SEC first queried...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency wants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop contingency plans in case one of their counterparties blows up.

Primary market originators and due diligence providers say the elusive market in private placement MBS deals has been gaining strength this year. “We’re seeing three to five private deals a month,” said Jeff Taylor, managing partner of Digital Risk, a New York-based risk management and due diligence firm. As for the underlying product, it’s across the board, he added. “It can be jumbo, nonperforming, and re-performing.” But the deals are also much smaller than the rapidly growing public MBS deals. Digital Risk, which conducts due diligence reviews on the underlying collateral, said...

Decisions by federal regulators have combined to promote issuance of agency MBS over non-agency MBS, a trend that is expected to continue for years to come, according to industry analysts. Panelists at a talk this week sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute cited rules from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau along with pending rules to set requirements for risk retention on MBS issuance and capital requirements for originations and securitization. “Until you know what the rules of the game are going to be...