Private mortgage insurers may be gaining momentum as the mortgage market steers toward a greater focus on purchase-mortgage lending, according to a new Inside Mortgage Finance analysis of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac data. The two government-sponsored enterprises securitized a total of $56.11 billion of home loans that included private MI coverage during the second quarter of 2013. That was up 12.1 percent from the first three months of the year, compared to a 5.1 percent decline in total GSE business over that period. Private MI activity is...[Includes one data chart]

Two different groups holding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock filed suit against the government this week claiming that the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency are illegally poaching the profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that should go to shareholders. The FHFA and Treasury illegally implemented the so-called sweep amendment last summer that altered Fannie’s and Freddie’s preferred stock purchase agreements, according to the suits. The amended agreement allows the government to seize nearly all the profits of the two government-sponsored enterprises. This is a direct violation of the 2008 conservatorship legislation, according to the lawsuit filed by hedge fund Perry Capital in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Less than two days later, Fairholme Capital Management filed...

The two GSEs securitized $56 billion of home loans that included private MI coverage during the second quarter, a 12 percent jump from 1Q.

Just as with the Perry GSE litigation, Fairholme’s suit demands that the Treasury amendment to the preferred stock purchase agreement be voided.

The jumbo MBS market has another new issuer: Nomura. But the credit enhancement on its first deal was increased due to geographic concentration risk.

Any lender that has refis greater than 50 percent could be at risk for layoffs, said one industry consultant.

Agency MBS accounted for 98 percent of credit union investments in mortgage securities, according to Inside MBS & ABS.

The suit was filed in December 2012 on behalf of hundreds of thousands of investors who bought stock in an offering by Fannie in May 2008, four months before the GSE was taken over by the government.

Mortgages modified by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac performed about the same for a year after modification but Freddie’s loans had a slightly worse performance starting some 18 months after modification, according to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The OCC Mortgage Metrics Report for the First Quarter of 2013 noted that Fannie and Freddie loans each had a 17 percent re-default rate six months after modification. The two GSEs were similarly tied at the 12-month mark, each posting a 24.4 percent re-default rate. Daylight begins to crack between the two GSEs at 18 months, with Fannie’s rate at an even 28.0 percent compared to Freddie’s 28.2 percent. At 24 months, Fannie’s mods saw a 29.4 percent re-default rate compared to Freddie’s 29.9 percent. The gap widens at 36 months when Fannie stood at 35.2 percent compared to Freddie’s 36.3 percent rate.

The linchpin for a viable and comprehensive National Mortgage Database is to ensure that the identities of both mortgage borrowers and mortgage servicers from whom the statistical information is collected for analysis are protected behind a firm wall of security countermeasures, according to project architects. During a recent webinar sponsored by the Urban Institute, Federal Housing Finance Agency National Mortgage Database Project Director Robert Avery told attendees that privacy is a paramount concern in order to make the project work. “The challenge is to protect borrower/lender personally identifiable information and provide useful data,” said Avery.