With the presidential election underway, many Americans are beginning to analyze and critique the candidate’s various policies – including their views on housing and finance.
A mortgage industry group wants to turn the TRID disclosure tables back on the regulators and reveal to homebuyers all the fees – including those imposed by the government – they have to pay for their home purchases, and not just those generated by the industry. The mortgage broker organization known as NAMB – The Association of Mortgage Professionals wants the CFPB and the Federal Housing Finance Agency to further clarify the TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule by including a new line item that clearly states the “hidden” guarantee-fees and loan- level price adjustments from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [However, it should be noted that the FHFA has no authorities under the Truth in Lending Act nor the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.] ...
The CFPB and the Department of Justice late last month announced a $10.6 million enforcement action against BancorpSouth, a regional bank headquartered in Tupelo, MS, alleging the lender engaged in discriminatory mortgage lending practices that harmed African-Americans and other minorities. Of particular note, the bureau said, “This is the CFPB’s first use of testing, sometimes referred to as ‘mystery shopping,’ to support an allegation of discrimination.” The government’s complaint accuses BancorpSouth of illegally redlining in Memphis, TN, denying certain African-Americans mortgage loans more often than similarly situated non-Hispanic white applicants, and charging African-American customers more for certain mortgage loans than non-Hispanic white borrowers with similar loan qualifications. The agencies also alleged the lender implemented an explicitly discriminatory loan denial policy...
The redlining risk that lenders face these days is morphing to include not just a consideration of a bank’s internal behavior but also a comparison of the bank’s performance against its peers – a far more nebulous and uncertain standard of accountability. During a presentation at the American Bankers Association’s regulatory compliance conference last month in San Diego, Carl Pry, a managing director at Treliant Risk Advisors, told attendees, “Regulators are defining redlining risk a little bit differently these days. Traditionally, redlining involved looking at your own bank’s map: you plot out where your applications are, where the loans are, where the denials are – and you stand back and take a look and see, perhaps, that there are a lot of ...
RSS