Investors in ABS backed by private student loans strongly oppose proposals in Congress to change bankruptcy laws in an effort to help such borrowers. In a letter this week to members of Congress, the American Securitization Forum said the proposals would increase the cost of private student loans and harm the investments of those holding private student loan ABS.

It hasn’t been an easy time for due diligence firms that make their living off the mortgage business, at least not this year. Firms like Allonhill LLC, which bulked up on staff to handle the rush of work on investor buyback demands, have been cutting back in recent months as those contracts run their natural course.

The key to advancing tomorrow’s big picture housing finance reform should begin today through a series of smaller steps starting with targeted, nearly ready-to-go reductions to Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s credit risk, according to a proposal by Moody’s Analytics.

Improving market conditions and strengthening appetites on Wall Street have encouraged a pair of MBS-buying real estate investment trusts to hit up the equity markets, including an initial public offering from relative newcomer First Oaks, which touts a hybrid investment model.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities remained the preferred investment choice of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks during the fourth quarter of 2012, with a slight decrease from the previous quarter, according to a new ranking and analysis by Inside The GSEs based on data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Ginnie Mae securities also posted a negligible decrease within the FHLBank system during the period ending Dec. 31, 2012. GSE MBS accounted for 72.3 percent of combined FHLBank MBS portfolios, down 1.1 percent from the third quarter. The Finance Agency’s data do not separately break out Fannie and Freddie securities.

The majority of financial institutions defending themselves against a massive litigation initiative by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for toxic mortgage-backed securities purchased by the GSEs launched a counteroffensive this week by urging a federal appeals court to intervene in their favor against the “unfair” trial judge. Fifteen banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS Americas, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, filed a joint petition with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York complaining that U.S. District Judge Denise Cote has engaged in a “one-sided” approach designed to force a settlement rather than “foster fair and reasonable determination of the issues.”

The use of premium pricing to induce more borrowers to opt for FHA streamline refinancing may be a boon for FHA borrowers but clearly a bane for investors in Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities, according to Barclays Research analysts. There are indications that more FHA lenders are resorting to premium pricing, in which borrowers pay a higher mortgage rate in return for lowering the cost of obtaining the loan. Its use seems to be increasing, which also raises the risk of Ginnie Mae prepayments, said ...

It will take about five years for the new common mortgage securitization platform being developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to become fully functional, according to Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency.Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, DeMarco explained that the plan for a single MBS platform that would be run by a new government entity separate from Fannie and Freddie “does not mean we are consolidating the companies.” The platform would have its own CEO and chairman and office space separate from the two government-sponsored enterprises. It could, in time, be sold to the private sector, he said.

Nomura recently made a $78.0 million make-whole payment on one of its non-agency MBS deals that was enough to completely pay off the class A notes and reverse substantial realized losses on the class M1 and M2 securities, according to Barclays Capital. Such loan-level repurchases have been uncommon since topping out at about $6.0 billion in payments in 2007.

Banks and rating services have strong concerns regarding proposed revisions to the Basel securitization framework that would impact capital requirements for securities holdings. They warn that the proposal would discourage banks from participating in the securitization markets.In December, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed a revised securitization framework it said would make capital requirements more prudent and risk sensitive, mitigate reliance on external credit ratings and reduce the so-called cliff effects in capital requirements. The BCBS proposed two possible hierarchies for assigning capital, enhancements to current ratings-based approaches, and new approaches.