Publicly traded real estate investment trusts that buy MBS continued to whittle down their positions in government and agency product during the third quarter, a trend that some fear may have no bottom. Market leader Annaly Capital Management trimmed its MBS holdings to $66.3 billion during the period, a 1.9 percent sequential decline, but an ugly 18.6 percent drop compared to the third quarter of last year. It is investing more of its cash in commercial product. Number two ranked American Capital Agency Corp. was...[Includes one data table]
The Structured Finance Industry Group put out the third edition of its RMBS 3.0 “Green Papers” initiative early this week, featuring dozens of model representations and warranties for new non-agency residential MBS, including a range of proposed standardized constructs. “This release substantially builds upon our growing series of Green Papers, which are aimed at restoring confidence to the ‘private label’ RMBS market,” the trade group said. The first and second editions were released in 2014. The 39 model reps and warrants included in the third edition complete...
The hedging results of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – including instruments bought to protect the value of agency MBS – had different results in the third quarter as interest rates unexpectedly declined and stayed low for several weeks. Overall, Fannie booked $2.6 billion of negative charges against the value of its derivatives in the third quarter while Freddie booked a much larger charge on its hedging activities: $4.2 billion. The differential did not pass...
Three separate issuers of jumbo MBS shopped deals in the past week, giving a jolt to a market that has been somewhat subdued since the end of the first quarter. Industry analysts suggest that while liquidity for new jumbo MBS remains limited, the deals can be a good investment. Redwood Trust is set to issue a somewhat unusual $337.08 million jumbo MBS, Credit Suisse is preparing a deal and Five Oaks Investment issued a $251.27 million security this week, according to rating reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. At the end of October, Two Harbors Investment issued...
A recent settlement between DBRS and the Securities and Exchange Commission suggests that in the years following the financial crisis, the rating service didn’t dedicate enough resources to reviewing ratings on outstanding non-agency MBS. The SEC found that between April 2009 and February 2011, DBRS employed only one analyst who was principally responsible for the majority of surveillance tasks for the firm’s outstanding ratings for non-agency MBS and real estate mortgage investment conduits. DBRS had more than 5,000 applicable ratings outstanding in that span. The SEC added...
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association recently filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants to reverse a case in which the Federal Housing Finance Agency argued that Nomura Holdings sold shoddy MBS to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In the case of FHFA vs. Nomura Holdings, a judge ruled in May, after a three-week bench trial, that Nomura and RBS Securities were liable for the claims brought by the FHFA and knowingly sold bad MBS to the government-sponsored enterprises before the 2008 financial crisis. The MBS were backed by mortgages with an unpaid principal balance of about $2.05 billion at the time of purchase. Nomura appealed...
The Federal Home Loan Banks appear to be eyeing a bigger share of the government-backed lending market with the announcement of a new servicing-release option for FHA, VA and rural housing loans sold into the Mortgage Partnership Finance program. The addition of a servicing-released option from Nationstar Mortgage, a top-10 mortgage servicer, to an already existing servicing-retained execution will give participating lenders greater flexibility in pricing and selling government-backed mortgages they have originated into the secondary market, said Matt Feldman, president of the Chicago FHLB. Previously, program participants were required...
Federal regulators late last month rejected industry requests that swap agreements entered into by securitization vehicles be exempt from new capital and margin requirements. The three federal banking regulators, along with the Federal Housing Finance Agency, finalized a rule that requires covered swap entities to collect and post initial margin to counterparties that are swap entities or financial end users with material swaps exposure of $8 billion or more. The Structured Finance Industry Group had argued...
The interim guidelines modify three key areas where lender-complaints have been common, including a revision to the calculation of the owner-occupancy ratio.
RSS