Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reported similarly sour earnings results for the third quarter with both government-sponsored enterprises expressing concern about their growing risk exposure to struggling private mortgage insurance companies. Freddie noted in its 10-Q filing that “the financial condition of certain of our mortgage insurers continued to deteriorate” during the July-September period. Fannie sounded a similar alarm in its own earnings statement. “The already weak financial condition of many of our mortgage insurer counterparties deteriorated at...(Includes one data chart)

Despite buying back some $5.4 billion in mortgages during the third quarter of 2011, mortgage lenders made only a small dent in the huge number of unresolved disputes with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over representations and warranties. According to third-quarter financial reports from the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie still had a whopping $12.2 billion of outstanding repurchase claims as of the end of September. That was down only slightly from the $12.7 billion in unresolved buybacks at the midway point in the year. The GSEs reported that seller-servicers...(Includes one data chart)

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will follow the practice of other federal regulators by providing advance notice of potential enforcement actions to individuals and firms under investigation. The bureau said its Early Warning Notice process allows the subject of an investigation a chance to respond to any potential legal violations that CFPB enforcement personnel believe have been committed before the agency ultimately decides whether to initiate legal action. But there are no guarantees. “The decision whether to give such notice is discretionary, and a notice may not be appropriate in some situations, such as in...

Delays, staff shortages and changes in leadership have put a damper on FHA efforts to identify risks in its single-family mortgage insurance programs, which could affect its ability to minimize financial risks, according to the Government Accountability Office. In a report to the chairman and the ranking minority member of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, the GAO concluded that while the FHA has taken steps to assess credit and operational risks, the assessment strategy is not comprehensive. The risk assessment efforts are not integrated, and the FHA lacks annual assessments and mechanisms to...

The Obama administration’s refinance program for underwater mortgages got a much-publicized jolt of expanded guidelines that could stimulate new business, but the older Home Affordable Modification Program appears to be slowing down. An Inside Mortgage Finance analysis of recently released HAMP data reveals that only 74,630 new trial mods were started under the program during the third quarter. That was down 7.1 percent from the second quarter and represented the lowest number since the program began. Although there was an 11.8 percent increase in...(Includes one data chart)

The U.S. Supreme Court will determine whether disparate impact claims can be applied to the Fair Housing Act and lending discrimination cases by reviewing a Minnesota case involving rental housing. Although many fair lending cases based on disparate impact have been brought and settled over the years, the standard has not been universally interpreted by federal appeals courts. In Magner v. Gallagher, private landlords sued the city of St. Paul, MN, for enforcing its housing code, leading to claims by the landlords that shutting down their properties made it too difficult for minority renters to find...

Life isn’t getting any easier for mortgage lending giant Wells Fargo when it comes to litigation. The top-ranked mortgage lender through the first nine months of the year took a couple of high-profile shots in just the last two weeks or so. Last week, Illinois’s Cook County Judge Carolyn Quinn gave the green light to a suit filed by state Attorney General Lisa Madigan against Wells, which accuses the lender of offering financial incentives to employees to put minority borrowers who qualified for prime mortgages into subprime loans during the 2005-2007 time frame. Illinois has a similar axe to grind against Countrywide Financial Corp., which was acquired by Bank of America Corp. three years ago.

Despite its fairly impressive success rate in fending off hostile litigation, MERSCorp and its Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems remain popular targets. This time around, it’s Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden filing suit in Delaware Chancery Court against them, alleging repeated violations of the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. “Since at least the 1600s, real property rights have been a cornerstone of our society,” said AG Biden. “MERS has raised serious questions about who owns what in America. A man or woman’s home is not just his or her largest investment, it’s their castle. Rules matter. A homeowner has the obligation to pay the mortgage on time, and lenders must follow the rules if they are seeking to take away someone’s house through foreclosure. The honor system won’t work.”

The nation’s five largest mortgage servicing companies now face a tab of $25 billion to bring to a conclusion the long-running negotiations with the state attorneys general over industry foreclosure practices, according to published reports of the latest behind-the-scenes developments. The deal with the big five servicers – Ally Financial Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. – is now said to include $5 billion in cash penalties, along with the requirement to produce $3 billion in mortgage refinances. Other aspects of the settlement are said to include principal reductions and other forms of aids to struggling homeowners. The top servicers would be released from certain claims having to do with loan servicing and origination, according to the reports – but to what extent exactly remains unclear. And there would be no release from claims related to mortgage securitization.

Last week, the 14 mortgage servicers covered by the enforcement actions taken by the banking regulators in April 2011 began mailing letters to eligible borrowers that explain how to request a review of their case if they believe they suffered financial injury as a result of errors, misrepresentations or other deficiencies in foreclosure proceedings related to their primary residence between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2010. Borrowers may also visit www.IndependentForeclosureReview.com for more information about the review and claim process. Assistance with requesting a review and answers to questions about the process are available. Requests for review by the servicers’ independent consultants must be received by April 30, 2012. As part of the enforcement actions taken by the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision, the servicers had to correct deficiencies in their servicing and foreclosure processes and to enlist independent firms to conduct a multi-faceted independent review of foreclosure actions taken during 2009 and 2010.