The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau late last week won a fresh hearing of its lawsuit with PHH Mortgage, with the attention likely to center on constitutional issues rather than the agency’s aggressive interpretation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit accepted the CFPB’s request for an en banc hearing of its lawsuit with PHH. In October, a three-judge panel of the appeals court ruled in favor of PHH, rejecting the agency’s RESPA interpretation regarding captive mortgage-insurance practices that had for years been widely accepted as legal, even though such programs have been in run-off mode since the housing meltdown. The issue that’s...