The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments this week in an important fee-splitting case under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and one issue that took up a lot of air time was whether RESPA is fundamentally a law barring kick-backs or a price-control statute. The key legal provision being examined in Freeman v. Quicken Loans is RESPA Section 8(b), which provides that, “No person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service in connection with a transaction involving a...