Alabama. Last week, in Reed v. Chase Home Finance LLC, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama rejected a mortgage lender defendant's motion to dismiss or amend a putative class action alleging a violation of the Truth in Lending Act. Plaintiff Reed alleged defendant Chase Home Finance failed to provide the borrower with notice that it was a new creditor as required by TILA Section 1641(g) when it was assigned an ownership interest in plaintiff's mortgage and note. The defendant argued that plaintiff’s position that the note was assigned to defendant, explicitly pled in the complaint, has to be “supported by factual material rendering the assertion plausible.”