Product Details

A little-known case about disparate impact in housing and lending discrimination now before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will likely be the stage for the next legal debate on the question whether disparate-impact claims are permissible under the Fair Housing Act. It could also decide whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau can apply disparate impact in its examinations and investigations. With the Mount Holly, NJ, town council reportedly poised to vote on a proposed settlement, the U.S. Supreme Court, for the second time in two years, would be deprived of the opportunity to decide the fate of disparate impact. Reports indicate the town council may have a decision by Nov. 7 and a settlement could end the case, Mount Holly v. Mount Holly Garden Citizens in Action, Inc., before scheduled oral arguments on Dec. 4. The Supreme Court was poised...