House Democrats doubled down on their ongoing feud with the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency this week as they demand answers from the GSE regulator about a previously unknown 2010 Fannie Mae pilot program to forgive borrower’s mortgage debt that was shelved due to what Dems say was a philosophical opposition to loan writedowns.In a letter to FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco, Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-MD, and John Tierney, D-MA, of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, accused the agency head of being less than forthright in his response to lawmakers justifying the FHFA’s position against the writedown of underwater GSE mortgages.“The single most significant revelation in your letter to Congress is that, even based on your own questionable assumptions and data, principal reduction programs serve the taxpayer interests even when compared to your preferred alternative of forbearance,” said Cummings and Tierney.

Congress should consider changing the mandate of the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to address a “conflict of interest” that inhibits the Finance Agency’s supervision of the GSEs, a housing economist told senators this week.Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Columbia School of Business Professor Christopher Mayer said a significant problem with the ongoing operation of the GSEs has been the failure to adequately address operational conflicts.“The evidence suggests that the conflict of interest between the businesses of providing mortgage guarantees and managing a large retained portfolio of mortgages and [mortgage-backed securities] has led to obstacles to normal credit conditions,” said Mayer.

The second most senior Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee has filed a bill that would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce the principal on loans they own or guarantee.The Principal Reduction Act of 2012, H.R. 3841, sponsored by Rep. Maxine Waters, D-CA, would prevent foreclosure of, and provide for the reduction of principal on, mortgages held by the GSEs.Specifically the bill would require Fannie and Freddie to reduce principal to a 90 percent loan-to-value ratio. It would protect taxpayers by requiring shared appreciation of one-third of the profits if the home is sold and it would allow the GSEs to recapture any reduced funds if the loan subsequently defaults and enters foreclosure.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s debt issuance would be accounted for in the calculation of the federal debt under legislation passed by House Republicans this week.Members approved H.R. 3581, the Budget and Accounting Transparency Act of 2012, sponsored by Rep. Scott Garrett, R-NJ, by a 239 to 181 vote. Garrett’s bill is part of a comprehensive package of 10 reform bills House GOP members are pushing to enforce spending controls and oversight of federal spending.“Off-budget liabilities such as government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac threaten any progress we make towards deficit and debt reduction,” said Garrett, who is vice chairman of the Budget Committee, as well as chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises.

A proposed rule by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to require Federal Home Loan Banks to verify a member’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating, as well as to be responsible for overseeing members’ compliance with the FHFA’s first-time homebuyers standards, would be an unnecessary and unwelcome change, according to public commenters.Issued in November, the proposal would replace the current practice in which members submit to the Finance Agency the community support statement.Instead, FHLBanks would review a member’s CRA rating using publicly-available information from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council or from the member’s federal banking regulator.

The already formidable task of replacing the outgoing CEOs at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac got a little harder this week following swift congressional action to cut compensation levels at the GSEs down to size.Both the House this week and the Senate have approved by overwhelming margins the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, which would bar members of Congress and congressional staff from using non-public, inside information for private gain.While the House version of the STOCK Act is weaker than the Senate’s, both versions retained an amendment sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-AZ and Jay Rockefeller, D-WV, to prohibit Fannie and Freddie executives from receiving multi-million dollar bonuses while the GSEs remain in federal conservatorship.

Housing economists challenged the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s controversial stance against permitting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allow principal forgiveness in loan modifications, telling U.S. senators this week that mortgage loan writedowns would go a long way to cure the ongoing housing crash and foreclosure crisis. Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi told lawmakers that government policy encouraging more mortgage modifications, particularly those involving “substantial principle writedowns” would...

A week after federal and state enforcement agencies launched a residential MBS investigative effort, reports have surfaced that Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs are about to be sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly misrepresenting the quality of mortgages they packaged and sold to investors. Officials at the SEC, which never confirms specific Wells Notices of impending legal action, declined to comment on the investigation, as did spokesmen for Ally, Citi and Goldman. Representatives from Bank of America and Deutsche Bank did not...

Moody’s Investor Services ranked as the most active rating service in the non-mortgage ABS market last year, but finished 2011, as the least involved in non-agency MBS activity, according to a new Inside MBS & ABS ranking and analysis. Moody’s rated a total of $89.3 billion of non-mortgage ABS last year, or 70.4 percent of total issuance. That was up from a 53.7 percent share in 2010, when Moody’s rated some $58.9 billion and finished second to Standard & Poor’s. Moody’s strengths in 2011 were in the credit card, vehicle finance and business loan sectors, capturing over 70.0 percent of each of those...

State attorneys general and federal officials this week announced a massive legal settlement with five major mortgage servicers, finally concluding a torturous 16-month-long negotiation. Some 49 states – including New York, California and Florida – agreed to the $25 billion settlement with JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Ally Bank and Citigroup. The agreement does not provide blanket immunity for the lenders, which can still face criminal charges and are subject to claims over securitization practices and claims brought by individual borrowers. The agreement is based on investigations by...