Volume 23 - Number 2
January 23, 2012
Court Affirms Borrower Testimony Trumps Rebuttable Presumption
In Marr v. Bank of America, N.A., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed that borrower testimony alone can overcome the Truth in Lending Act’s “rebuttable presumption” that a borrower has received two notices of his right to rescind a refinance transaction, despite a written acknowledgement by the borrower to the contrary. In this case, the borrower argued that he wasn’t given two right-to-rescind notices as required under TILA, even though he had signed a document indicating he had. He said he had filed away and left undisturbed the documents he received when ...
Subscribers to Inside Regulatory Strategies have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.
Subscriber Log In
If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.
Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?
Subscribe
This biweekly keeps mortgage executives on top of the onslaught of new legal and regulatory issues the industry has been seeing.
Pay-Per-View
You can purchase this article for $50.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on insidemortgagefinance.com.
