Mortgage programs that use less than 24 months of bank statements to verify a borrower’s ability to repay back a loan are riskier than more traditional mortgages and may be prone to running afoul of the CFPB’s ATR rule, according to a new report from Moody’s Investors Service. “Although longer-term bank statement programs would likely satisfy the CFPB’s ATR rule, short-term programs may not,” analysts at Moody’s said. “To fully understand cashflow patterns typical of the borrower’s line of work, the longer the track record, the better,” they added. “The fewer statements a program requires, the higher the likelihood for inconsistencies in the calculation of available income from loan-to-loan.” Under the ATR rule, as Moody’s noted, the originator is required ...