Volume 25 - Number 23
November 10, 2014
Worth Noting/The Week Ahead
Disparate Impact Theory of Legal Liability Struck Down. Last week, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dealt a heavy blow to the position of the Department of Housing and Urban Development – as well as the CFPB – that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. In American Insurance Association v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the judge struck down HUD’s disparate impact rule, determining that the Fair Housing Act prohibits “disparate treatment only.” In promulgating its disparate impact rule, the court said HUD exceeded its authority under the Administrative Procedures Act. “The ruling is in line with what we have long believed the law to be and consistent with what we argued in ...
Subscribers to Inside the CFPB have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.
Subscriber Log In
If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.
This biweekly keeps mortgage executives on top of the onslaught of new legal and regulatory issues the industry has been seeing.
You can purchase this article for $55.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on insidemortgagefinance.com.
Please contact Customer Service if you need assistance: 1-800-570-5744