Volume 2014 - Number 38
October 9, 2014
If Third Time’s the Charm, SCOTUS May Finally Render An Opinion on Fair Housing Disparate-Impact Claims
The U.S. Supreme Court gets another crack at deciding whether plaintiffs can bring a disparate-impact lawsuit under the Fair Housing Act (and by extension, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act), a question that has divided courts, lenders and consumer advocacy groups for years. The court’s partial grant of the petition in the Texas case would be its third opportunity in two years to rule on the controversial question. Two prior cases raising that issue, Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizen Action, Inc. and Magner v. Gallagher, were both settled before oral argument could be presented before the court. SCOTUS has agreed...
Subscribers to Inside Mortgage Finance have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.
Subscriber Log In
If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.
A weekly "must read" for industry executives. Thoroughly covers regulatory, political, legislative and market issues in the residential mortgage business.
You can purchase this article for $55.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on insidemortgagefinance.com.
Please contact Customer Service if you need assistance: 1-800-570-5744