Volume 2014 - Number 35
September 18, 2014
IL Court’s Narrow Ruling in Disparate-Impact Case Allows DC Court to Focus on Bigger Picture
An Illinois district court’s decision that federal preemption issues are not ripe may now prompt a federal district court in Washington, DC, to examine the broader issue of whether disparate impact is a valid claim under the Fair Housing Act. The Illinois lawsuit, Property Casualty Insurers Association of America v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, is one of two insurance-industry legal challenges to HUD’s disparate-impact rule. The second case was filed by two other trade groups, the American Insurance Association and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and is pending in federal court in the nation’s capital. According to the final rule that HUD adopted in February 2013, a practice has...
Subscribers to Inside Mortgage Finance have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.
Subscriber Log In
If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.
A weekly "must read" for industry executives. Thoroughly covers regulatory, political, legislative and market issues in the residential mortgage business.
You can purchase this article for $55.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on insidemortgagefinance.com.
Please contact Customer Service if you need assistance: 1-800-570-5744