Advanced Search

Volume 29 - Number 7

April 2, 2018

CFPB is Denied Reconsideration in Another RESPA Case

After losing ground in a Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act interpretation in the PHH case, the CFPB lost the motion for reconsideration in another RESPA case, which carries further implications for the industry, attorneys said. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky denied the CFPB’s motion to reconsider a decision in favor of Kentucky law firm Borders & Borders over allegations it illegally paid kickbacks under the RESPA statute. The significance of the case lies in the fact ...

Subscribers to Inside the CFPB have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.

Subscriber Log In

If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.

Forgot your password?

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?


This biweekly keeps mortgage executives on top of the onslaught of new legal and regulatory issues the industry has been seeing.



You can purchase this article for $55.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on

Pay Per View

Please contact Customer Service if you need assistance: 1-800-570-5744


What’s your opinion on how Mick Mulvaney has managed the CFPB since he took over three months ago?

He’s done a good job of paring back the agency’s excesses and we’d like to see more.


I hope he totally dismantles the agency and sends those functions back to the agencies hence they came.


Not bad, but he needs to take his time making additional changes.


We’re totally aghast. He’s gone way too far in protecting the rights of companies not consumers!