State Regulators

Browse articles from all of our Newsletters related to State Regulators.

May 18, 2012 - Inside The GSEs

Delaware County Finds GSEs Not Exempt From Transfer Taxes

Real estate transactions in New Castle County, DE, will no longer be exempt from transfer tax as a conveyance from a governmental entity, following a new ruling from the county’s legal counsel.The New Castle county law department found that Fannie and Freddie are federally chartered private corporations and not governmental agencies. The county’s revised interpretation of the realty transfer tax statute earlier this month, “consistent with the growing practice in other jurisdictions,” has prompted the county to enforce the distinction starting in June.


May 14, 2012 - Inside Regulatory Strategies

Concerns About Dodd-Frank and Federal Preemption Overblown

Industry and legal concerns that enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act made substantial changes to the federal preemption landscape are “much ado about nothing,” according to two legal scholars at the law firm Barnett Sivon & Natter PC in Washington, DC. In a scholarly work scheduled for publication in the Virginia Law and Business Review this fall, the pair addresses the view of some commentators that the Dodd-Frank Act changed the standard used to determine if a state law is preempted. Some have felt that state law is only preempted if the law...


May 11, 2012 - Inside FHA Lending

Beware of Conflicting FHA Rules, Standards

Mortgage servicers could find themselves in a quandary as they implement the national servicing standards outlined in the March foreclosure settlement agreement, especially if they run into conflicting FHA requirements. Compliance experts say that while many of the settlement standards could be carried out within the FHA program without being at odds with existing FHA requirements, conflicts do exist with the guidelines that cannot be resolved. Even when it is technically possible to comply with both FHA guidelines and the settlement standards, it is still going to ...


April 27, 2012 - Inside Nonconforming Markets

Mixed Views on Lender-Placed Insurance

Regulatory scrutiny of lender-placed insurance is increasing, but non-agency servicers claim that they are compliant with existing and impending regulations for such insurance coverage. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is focusing on lender-placed insurance, provisions were also included in the recent $25.0 billion servicing settlement, Fannie Mae recently updated its policies and a number of state investigations are underway. “There appear to be a number of very significant problems with ...


April 16, 2012 - Inside Regulatory Strategies

State Roundup

Ohio. The state Attorney General’s office recently finalized amendments to the state’s ability-to-repay rules that provide a safe harbor for certain types of mortgages. Under the new rules, a borrower is deemed to have an ability to repay and a reasonable probability of payment if the lender provides a fully-amortizing fixed-rate refinance mortgage that has the same or a lesser interest rate or principal amount than the current loan, and does not lengthen the payoff date. Pennsylvania. The state Department...


April 6, 2012 - Inside Mortgage Trends

Settlement Servicing Template for New Regulation

A federal district court judge in Washington DC this week signed off on the proposed $25 billion settlement agreement between the federal government, state attorneys general and the top five mortgage servicers, putting in place a potential template for national standards for the mortgage servicing industry. On April 6, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia entered the proposed consent judgments against Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and Ally Financial, including a settlement term sheet and additional exhibits specific...


Webinars

Mortgage Beat

Industry Reports

Data Reports:

Research Reports:

Poll

Are current mortgage underwriting standards too tough?

Yes, they don’t reflect current market conditions and need to be adjusted to allow borrowers with below 700 FICO scores and smaller downpayments to qualify for mortgages.
Yes, and something needs to be done to significantly reduce repurchase or buyback risk so that lenders don’t apply even tougher underwriting overlays.
No, the standards are appropriate given current risks and the major default problems the mortgage market has experienced over the past several years.

vote to see results
Housing Pulse

Most Popular Stories