Advanced Search

Volume 23 - Number 4

February 20, 2012

Worth Noting

In response to a request from the Federal Trade Commission, a U.S. district court has banned a number of defendants from providing mortgage relief services after the agency cracked down on an alleged scam that caused consumers to lose almost $19 million. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants deceptively claimed they were affiliated with or approved by consumers’ lenders, that they could prevent foreclosure, and that they would refund consumers’ money if they failed to deliver promised services. Consumers were allegedly instructed not to contact their lenders and to stop making ...

Subscribers to Inside Regulatory Strategies have full access to all its stories and data online. Visitors may become subscribers for full access or may purchase individual articles and data.

Subscriber Log In

If you are a current subscriber or already purchased this article, please login below.

Forgot your password?

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?

Subscribe

This biweekly keeps mortgage executives on top of the onslaught of new legal and regulatory issues the industry has been seeing.

 

Pay-Per-View

You can purchase this article for $50.00 without subscribing and always have access to it on insidemortgagefinance.com.

Pay Per View

Poll

Are current mortgage underwriting standards too tough?

Yes, they don’t reflect current market conditions and need to be adjusted to allow borrowers with below 700 FICO scores and smaller downpayments to qualify for mortgages.
Yes, and something needs to be done to significantly reduce repurchase or buyback risk so that lenders don’t apply even tougher underwriting overlays.
No, the standards are appropriate given current risks and the major default problems the mortgage market has experienced over the past several years.

vote to see results
Housing Pulse