Top ARM and Jumbo Producers

Top ARM and Jumbo Producers

Ranking of top ARM and Jumbo producers on separate charts. Data available from 1998 to 2011.

  • 2011: Top 15 ARM producers and top 20 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2010: Top 15 ARM producers and top 10 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2009: Top 15 ARM producers and top 10 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2008: Top 20 ARM producers and top 10 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2007: Top 20 ARM producers and top 20 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2006: Top 20 ARM producers and top 20 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2005: Top 20 ARM producers and top 20 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2004: Top 20 ARM producers and top 20 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2003: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2002: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2001: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 2000: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 1999: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.
  • 1998: Top 15 ARM producers and top 15 non-agency jumbo producers.

    • 2011 Data

    2010 Data

    2009 Data

    2008 Data

    2007 Data

    2006 Data

    2005 Data

    2004 Data

    2003 Data

    2002 Data

    2001 Data

    2000 Data

    1999 Data

    1998 Data

    Top Interest-Only/Option ARM Producers

    Ranking of the top interest-only/option ARM lenders by volume in dollars and market share. Includes the percentage of the lender's total originations nontraditional mortgages comprise as well as option ARM, interest-only ARM and interest-only FRM volume, as well as estimated totals for all lenders. Data available from 2006-2008.

    2008 Data

    2007 Data

    2006 Data

Webinars

Mortgage Beat

Industry Reports

Data Reports:

Research Reports:

Poll

Are current mortgage underwriting standards too tough?

Yes, they don’t reflect current market conditions and need to be adjusted to allow borrowers with below 700 FICO scores and smaller downpayments to qualify for mortgages.
Yes, and something needs to be done to significantly reduce repurchase or buyback risk so that lenders don’t apply even tougher underwriting overlays.
No, the standards are appropriate given current risks and the major default problems the mortgage market has experienced over the past several years.

vote to see results
Housing Pulse

Most Popular Stories