By Brandon Ivey

The Economics of New Non-Agency MBS

January 31, 2012

This week’s issue of Inside Nonconforming Markets will include a look at the economics of the issuance of new non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Attendees at the American Securitization Forum’s annual conference last week in Las Vegas suggested that non-agency MBS issuance will resume in a substantial manner only when the funding mechanism makes economic sense for big banks. Reginald Imamura, an executive vice president at PNC, said there is “overwhelming uncertainty” regarding the outlook for non-agency securitization.

Agency and portfolio execution currently remain better options for potential non-agency MBS issuers – due to investor demands and regulatory uncertainty, among other factors. “You’re going to see transactions that would have been securitizations held on bank portfolios,” said Scott Buchta, head of mortgage strategy at Sandler O’Neill & Partners, a financial services advisory firm.

Other stories slated for publication in the newsletter this week include:

  • Reaction to the non-agency MBS issued last week by Redwood Trust
  • The latest performance metrics from the non-agency Public-Private Investment Program
  • Details on the expansion and extension of the Home Affordable Modification Program
  • The prospects for the non-agency refi program proposed by President Obama
  • Details on the new team of regulators investigating the pooling and sale of non-agency MBS

Other areas of interest

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.


Add your comments ...

New to Inside Mortgage Finance? All commenters must register. Thank you.

Already Registered? Log in

Forgot your password? Click Here.

Poll

Are current mortgage underwriting standards too tough?

Yes, they don’t reflect current market conditions and need to be adjusted to allow borrowers with below 700 FICO scores and smaller downpayments to qualify for mortgages.
Yes, and something needs to be done to significantly reduce repurchase or buyback risk so that lenders don’t apply even tougher underwriting overlays.
No, the standards are appropriate given current risks and the major default problems the mortgage market has experienced over the past several years.

vote to see results
Housing Pulse