By Rachel Kurzius

A Hint that We'd Be Waiting for These Settlement Terms

February 10, 2012

“It's absurd that the mortgage settlement hasn't been made public, but it's also silly to say that, for that reason, it ‘doesn't exist,’” tweeted Wall Street Journal reporter Nick Timiraos earlier today. Shortly before that, American Banker posted an article that questioned whether the settlement terms were ready.

Indeed, the settlement terms are unavailable on the website created to provide information regarding the agreement, with a “Coming soon” as a place marker. But should we be surprised that the settlement isn’t formatted and ready for our perusal?

It has been readily apparent that, despite more than a year of preparation, the announcement was thrown together at the last minute. Take the email sent out early Thursday morning regarding the press conference, sent from the Housing and Urban Development Public Affairs Office (see below).

At the bottom of the email announcing the 10 a.m. presser, it said, “Media interested in attending must RSVP by 9:00 a.m. EST.” The email was sent out at 8:49 a.m. the same morning, meaning media had less than 11 minutes to meet the deadline. Not an impossible task, of course, but definitely the sign of a group in a hurry.

The rushed nature of the email isn’t an indicator of whether the settlement will be strong for homeowners, or thoughtless in its attention to securitized loans. It does imply, however, that the announcement itself was ramrodded through.  And for those of us with specific questions only the settlement terms can answer, it’s going to be a long weekend. 

 

 

The HUD email

 


Other areas of interest

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.


Add your comments ...

New to Inside Mortgage Finance? All commenters must register. Thank you.

Already Registered? Log in

Forgot your password? Click Here.

Poll

Are current mortgage underwriting standards too tough?

Yes, they don’t reflect current market conditions and need to be adjusted to allow borrowers with below 700 FICO scores and smaller downpayments to qualify for mortgages.
Yes, and something needs to be done to significantly reduce repurchase or buyback risk so that lenders don’t apply even tougher underwriting overlays.
No, the standards are appropriate given current risks and the major default problems the mortgage market has experienced over the past several years.

vote to see results
Housing Pulse